How Good Are You?

  • Thread starter smokinbandito12
  • Start date

How good are you at poker? (see 1st post for details)

  • 1

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • 2

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • 5

    Votes: 6 31.6%
  • 6

    Votes: 3 15.8%
  • 7

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • 8

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • 9

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • 10

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    19
smokinbandito12

smokinbandito12

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Total posts
151
Chips
0
On a scale from 1-10 how good do you think you are at your poker game of choice? I just want to see where everyone ranks themselves. Please see the guidelines below before you respond.

(1 you know how to play but thats all, 5 know something about the game but still have a lot to learn before you are great[average], 10 you could sit down with any nine players in the world and have a fair chance of winning)
 
Last edited:
aliengenius

aliengenius

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Total posts
4,596
Chips
0
six

obvioulsy your scale isn't continuous, as the definition you give for "5" should probably be more like a 2 or 3...
 
smokinbandito12

smokinbandito12

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Total posts
151
Chips
0
ok ill amend 5. you are good at poker but you still have a lot to learn. in other words you are everage. better than a lot of players, not as good as a lot of players. that better ag?
 
The PoolBoy

The PoolBoy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Total posts
1,281
Awards
1
Chips
0
i put8. iys not nl alienif your just a 4 or 3
 
aliengenius

aliengenius

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Total posts
4,596
Chips
0
Ok, but that doesn't make it a continuous scale. There is still a HUGE difference between 5 and 10, but a small difference between 1 and four...

I know it seem intuitive to make five the "average", but if you consider that that only 30% (less?) of poker player are winners, the "average" player is probably only a 2, with break even players a 3(.1)...
 
blankoblanco

blankoblanco

plays poker on hard mode
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2006
Total posts
6,129
Chips
0
Ok, but that doesn't make it a continuous scale. There is still a HUGE difference between 5 and 10, but a small difference between 1 and four...

I know it seem intuitive to make five the "average", but if you consider that that only 30% (less?) of poker player are winners, the "average" player is probably only a 2, with break even players a 3(.1)...

i agree. but man, this scale thing is getting way too complicated, i can't even vote now
 
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Chips
0
Ok, use this is a benchmark:

I said 5. I am a consistent winner and make a steady second income at $50NL ring games and at MTTs around $10 buyin but, if I were to sit down with 9 top pros, I`d be slaughtered and I know it.

I reckon that fits reasonably well with AG`s 6. I accept he could be a notch better than me.

So, if you reckon you are stronger than me (and AG) you are 6+, if not you are 5-.

Does that help ?
 
S

slick7545

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Total posts
10
Chips
0
hehe... not that may people voted but oh wells i put 8, i think of myself semi-professional. I"m not an idiot... I know that for sure
 
smokinbandito12

smokinbandito12

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Total posts
151
Chips
0
Ok, but that doesn't make it a continuous scale. There is still a HUGE difference between 5 and 10, but a small difference between 1 and four...

I know it seem intuitive to make five the "average", but if you consider that that only 30% (less?) of poker player are winners, the "average" player is probably only a 2, with break even players a 3(.1)...

This is true but i assumed that most people who were members of a poker forum are somewhat serious about the game so i tried adjust the scale to take this into account. You'll have to excuse my lack scale making abilities.:eek:

:smokin: :smokin: :bandit:
there sure are a lot of these things
 
zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
OK, how about this as a reference. What number would you consider someone who is able to consistently break even (so beat the rake but nothing more) online? Is that what you mean by 5? Or would that be more a 3 or so? Because I'd say even the 10th best player in the world would say something like 5 (unless they're an arrogant jerk). Everyone has a lot to learn, hell I'd say the best player in the world won't stay that way unless they continue to learn more and get better, although I guess the 10th best in the world wouldn't get slaughtered by the top 9, but you get the point. Basically you'd have like everyone but a few hundred in the entire world below 5. Also, please define "know something". I know this was just for fun but I want to accurately rate myself on your scale :)
 
pigpen02

pigpen02

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Total posts
2,978
Chips
0
On a scale from 1-10 how good do you think you are at your poker game of choice?

That makes absolute scale definitions moot. This is not rocket surgery.
 
KingCurtis

KingCurtis

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Total posts
9,946
Awards
1
Chips
1
Ive been officially playing online poker for a little over a year for real money........I voted myself a 1 mainly for the fact that I know that i can beat a lot of people with skill but I also know that I have so much to learn and need experience to be a much stronger and smarter player.
 
Top