Cyber security expert speaks about online poker security, risks, collusion, and more

Robbie Strazynski

Robbie Strazynski

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Total posts
119
Chips
0
Hi ccers,

As the integrity and safety of playing online poker is such an important issue to us all, it behooves us to be aware of related news and developments in that regard.

With online poker now legal in 3 U.S. states and battles being fought to expand legalization ever further, there are opponents of online poker (hint hint Sheldon Adelson and his cronies) arguing against it on unsafe security, collusion, and money laundering grounds.

My good friend, Eddie Harari, is a cyber security professional with over 25 years of experience in the field. He's also a recreational poker player, both live and online.

He was kind enough to put his expert knowledge into words "to help the cause" and make the case in favor of safe and secure online poker on technical grounds.

With that in mind, I'd like to invite you to read his article, which, over the last few hours since its publication, has received the full backing of the Poker Players Alliance.

http://cardplayerlifestyle.com/fully-secure-online-poker-possible/

Enjoy,

Robbie
 
Robbie Strazynski

Robbie Strazynski

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Total posts
119
Chips
0
Behooves us does it?

Well it behooved me :)

Sorry bout the SAT vocab there... was just in a good mood... how about:
  • it is incumbent upon us, or
  • we oughtta
Works? ;-)
Just kidding... I appreciate that you've taken an interest.
Robbie
 
hashtag

hashtag

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Total posts
142
Chips
0
I read it anyway. Didn't need any behooving :p

Good read, thanks for posting.
 
Peteyweestro

Peteyweestro

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Total posts
188
Chips
0
Good article, thanks my brother
 
punctual

punctual

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Total posts
1,057
Chips
0
Great Article. If we don't feel like it is safe to play online, we will tend not to want to play online.

How can one stop collusion at SnG's? If a bunch of friends from different locations across the country play in the same game, they can easily dominate SnG's. How would we tackle a problem like this? I guess using the "anomaly softwAre" mentioned in the article would prevent things like this from repeatedly occurring.....

pretty interesting
 
Robbie Strazynski

Robbie Strazynski

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Total posts
119
Chips
0
Great Article. If we don't feel like it is safe to play online, we will tend not to want to play online.

How can one stop collusion at SnG's? If a bunch of friends from different locations across the country play in the same game, they can easily dominate SnG's. How would we tackle a problem like this? I guess using the "anomaly softwAre" mentioned in the article would prevent things like this from repeatedly occurring.....

pretty interesting

Thanks for reading... good question. I just read today that an operator will be testing anonymous SNG registration... forgot which one... def a step in the right direction though.
 
R

rugby0

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Total posts
599
Chips
0
The point made about having a seperate computer for online poker play is correct. You can buy cheap components to set such a system in place. It is worth the time and expense.
 
O

OldDog456

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Total posts
139
Chips
0
Great article, there will always be a way to cheat...every sport does it. We just have to be able to read it and beat the odds.
 
D

dasher

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Total posts
99
Chips
0
How can one stop collusion at SnG's? If a bunch of friends from different locations across the country play in the same game, they can easily dominate SnG's. How would we tackle a problem like this? I guess using the "anomaly softwAre" mentioned in the article would prevent things like this from repeatedly occurring.....

pretty interesting
How could it be profitable to collude in SNGs? I can't see it all six handed. To keep the math simple, they pay $10 plus the fees each and the winner gets $39, second gets $21. So depending on the fees, one second is about break even. That means they need considerably more firsts colluding then they could get separately.

I would think cash games would be the danger of colluding. One player could raise for the other players good hands. They could run squeeze plays. They could know when some of their outs are out (i.e. in their partners hand). More room for action in cash games.
 
Top