D
Deceitful_Frank
Rock Star
Silver Level
Hello people!
Currently my 3betPF is around 4.6% over 8000 hands. I would like to increase it. Currently my range looks lilke this:
54s-98s... is 54 a good place to start or does 65 give more possibilities post flop? Also is it dangerous to increase my range to T9 or JT because of the possibility of making a pair and getting out kickered?
75s-T8s... would 64 be a better place to start? I would imagine 3betting with QT and J9 could spell trouble?
I think that most of my range comes from 3betting for value, TT+, KTs+, QJs+ depending on position. I rarely 3-bet with 99 and have read that 3-betting with TT is usually "ridiculously awful". If this is true and someone could explain why in plain english that would be great!
Is there an ideal proportion of value:light %s to 3bet?
I have read that baby suited AX can be added with good results? I guess this is due to wheel-straight and nut-flush possibilities post flop while ensuring your kicker is weak enough to stop you going after TP against multiple callers.
My main question is relating to adding NON-suited connectors and gappers to my range. After all they do come along three times as often!
Thinking about it, would a non-suited connector not have more possibilities post-flop than a suited gapper?
Ok how about the following:
A2s-A5s
65s-T9s... 54s has less straight possibilities and JTs could spell trouble.
65o-T9o... 54o has less straight possibilities and JTo could spell trouble.
64s-J9s... I think suited gappers have 75% of straight possiblities but I guess they have just as much chance to make 2pair, trips or flushes.
64o-J9o... REALLY NOT SURE ABOUT THESE?
What do you guys think?
Frank.
Currently my 3betPF is around 4.6% over 8000 hands. I would like to increase it. Currently my range looks lilke this:
54s-98s... is 54 a good place to start or does 65 give more possibilities post flop? Also is it dangerous to increase my range to T9 or JT because of the possibility of making a pair and getting out kickered?
75s-T8s... would 64 be a better place to start? I would imagine 3betting with QT and J9 could spell trouble?
I think that most of my range comes from 3betting for value, TT+, KTs+, QJs+ depending on position. I rarely 3-bet with 99 and have read that 3-betting with TT is usually "ridiculously awful". If this is true and someone could explain why in plain english that would be great!
Is there an ideal proportion of value:light %s to 3bet?
I have read that baby suited AX can be added with good results? I guess this is due to wheel-straight and nut-flush possibilities post flop while ensuring your kicker is weak enough to stop you going after TP against multiple callers.
My main question is relating to adding NON-suited connectors and gappers to my range. After all they do come along three times as often!
Thinking about it, would a non-suited connector not have more possibilities post-flop than a suited gapper?
Ok how about the following:
A2s-A5s
65s-T9s... 54s has less straight possibilities and JTs could spell trouble.
65o-T9o... 54o has less straight possibilities and JTo could spell trouble.
64s-J9s... I think suited gappers have 75% of straight possiblities but I guess they have just as much chance to make 2pair, trips or flushes.
64o-J9o... REALLY NOT SURE ABOUT THESE?
What do you guys think?
Frank.