E
emzadii
Rock Star
personal preference question:
in tournament poker, when you likely have the best hand by the river against a straightforward non-sticky villain, do you bet the river for max value (but risk the villain playing perfect by folding most of their range) or do you bet what you think the villain is willing to call (but risk missing out on value)?
MTT theory question:
if this scenario is run 1000 times, which strategy nets you more final tables?
coz, in poker literature, i've seen both strategies being advocated:
- bet max, let villain's calling be their problem
- bet to exploit
in tournament poker, when you likely have the best hand by the river against a straightforward non-sticky villain, do you bet the river for max value (but risk the villain playing perfect by folding most of their range) or do you bet what you think the villain is willing to call (but risk missing out on value)?
MTT theory question:
if this scenario is run 1000 times, which strategy nets you more final tables?
coz, in poker literature, i've seen both strategies being advocated:
- bet max, let villain's calling be their problem
- bet to exploit