L
lqprimetime
Enthusiast
Silver Level
In this specific hand, I am sure everyone saw it years ago on a show about "high stakes" poker.
player X: has Ah Qs
player Z: has Qc Jc
flop comes: Qd Jd 8h
so top pair top kicker vs top 2 pair.
Player X contemplates a call while saying it maybe a chop, and that prompts the commentator to say, when he just said chop he has just said he has AQ.
What gives this information away. I know it's a hard question maybe to answer because there are maybe many hands that would result in a chop if player Z didn't have QJ,
But I don't understand the thought process by someone saying a chop pot signals to pros he has AQ.
I would think top kicker would be an easy no chop. I would understand if there were more high cards or flushes/straights on the flop that would make the A kicker irrelevant against another Q.
But what signals this as AQ when mentioning chop. As an amateur I am used to simpler situations like 4 to a straight on the board signaling a chopped pot is very likely.
player X: has Ah Qs
player Z: has Qc Jc
flop comes: Qd Jd 8h
so top pair top kicker vs top 2 pair.
Player X contemplates a call while saying it maybe a chop, and that prompts the commentator to say, when he just said chop he has just said he has AQ.
What gives this information away. I know it's a hard question maybe to answer because there are maybe many hands that would result in a chop if player Z didn't have QJ,
But I don't understand the thought process by someone saying a chop pot signals to pros he has AQ.
I would think top kicker would be an easy no chop. I would understand if there were more high cards or flushes/straights on the flop that would make the A kicker irrelevant against another Q.
But what signals this as AQ when mentioning chop. As an amateur I am used to simpler situations like 4 to a straight on the board signaling a chopped pot is very likely.