E
encore_mjx
Rising Star
Bronze Level
Hi. I am really new here, and sorry if that question was asked before. I have seen previous posts about sharkscope inacurracy but I was under impression that these are very minor one.
I paid for subscription today (silver) and installed that desktop version. Anyway -for the pats 2 days sharkscope shows: 77 tournaments played, total winnings: -$31.78, roi: -14%
My holdem manager: 77 tournaments played, total winnings: +$69.08, roi: today +39%, yesterday +24%. Of course my bankroll is line with HM stats... So my question is - why such a big difference??? I was researching many players, and was wondering how on earth guy plays from 2009, with 100 turnaments a day, and roi of just +3%...
So is it the thing - that if sharkscope shows ROI of +3% the guy is really at +50-60% ROI???
Is it really worth to pay for that sharkscope? Is it anything better?
(I am not connected with HM in anyway).
Thanks
I paid for subscription today (silver) and installed that desktop version. Anyway -for the pats 2 days sharkscope shows: 77 tournaments played, total winnings: -$31.78, roi: -14%
My holdem manager: 77 tournaments played, total winnings: +$69.08, roi: today +39%, yesterday +24%. Of course my bankroll is line with HM stats... So my question is - why such a big difference??? I was researching many players, and was wondering how on earth guy plays from 2009, with 100 turnaments a day, and roi of just +3%...
So is it the thing - that if sharkscope shows ROI of +3% the guy is really at +50-60% ROI???
Is it really worth to pay for that sharkscope? Is it anything better?
(I am not connected with HM in anyway).
Thanks