Excellent point of view, thanks!Not raising pre-flop when you have pocket Aces. Then the big blind with two mediocre cards can get 2 pair on the flop because we did not raise.
I agree, sometimes we want more than 1 player to CALL, but it is dangerous to play Pocket AA against more than 1 playerNormally due to anxiety, we always think that no one can beat us and we want to go all in
Though I don't disagree and have played in pots holding AA beating out KK, QQ all-in, how would you quantify "dangerous?" In blackjack there's the concept of cross-correlated bets but in poker you need to address hand-ranges, position, bet sizing and a couple of other things. How would you "calculate" your bet sizing when holding AA relative to position in a 9 handed game?I agree, sometimes we want more than 1 player to CALL, but it is dangerous to play Pocket AA against more than 1 player
What do you think are the mistakes we lose with Pocket AA?
Acechador;5701831[I said:"Poker is 100% skill and 50% luck." - Phil Hellmuth[/I]
Of course, aggressiveness is important, Thanks for your commentI think it's played very aggressively, before the flop, if more people limp or raise, it's worth raising up to 5-6x BB to filter out your opponents.
It's important to distinguish between times we lose and played correctly, versus times we lose and made a mistake.
AA vs KK pre-flop: We still lose ~ 20% of the time. We won long-term EV and shouldn't worry because there's nothing we could do different.
If you make a mistake, it's often going to be taking the hand too far post-flop with deep stacks. For example:
We raise pre-flop with As Ac and get three callers.
Flop: 7h 6h 5h
Action: First player bets, second player calls, third player raises. This is a clear fold; if we put any more money in the pot, we are making a mistake (unless stacks are very short!)
It’s simple. Laying down AA when you’ve had a bad run out. Or laying down the hand to quickly when you’re opponents range doesn’t have enough hands that beat you. It’s usually one or the other
You are right, thanks for your commentIt’s simple. Laying down AA when you’ve had a bad run out. Or laying down the hand to quickly when you’re opponents range doesn’t have enough hands that beat you. It’s usually one or the other
Very good comment, doing Limp is a mistakeProbably cause we limp to much and let them get there
sometimes id rather go all-in preflop with AA instead of limpin a 3x etc
and letting them get a cheap flop with 22-1010's suited hands like 78 j9 10j etc and binkin something on the flop.. hurts when you lose those hands when you limp trying to trap them..
The most common complaints are that the system is rigged, but we do an analysis after losing our hand, we realize the mistakes we madeMany players have a significant issue with thinking that holding AA entitles them to win a huge pot and that if they didn't win then they were cheated. This theme pops up a lot in complaints about bad beats.
We have to remember that AA is just one pair which can be beat much more easily that we often think. 76 suited will beat AA by the river over 20% of the time: that's more than 1 in 5 AIPF hands that you're going to lose.
Though I don't disagree and have played in pots holding AA beating out KK, QQ all-in, how would you quantify "dangerous?" In blackjack there's the concept of cross-correlated bets but in poker you need to address hand-ranges, position, bet sizing and a couple of other things. How would you "calculate" your bet sizing when holding AA relative to position in a 9 handed game?
Cheers.