STL FAN
Rock Star
Silver Level
Each tournament even when played consistently is unique each time the player participates in the same tournament meaning a person can prepare the same way or have a system of thought but reality is that each stage is unique each time then only to say this is true or that is false is like chasing a flush expecting to hit it consistently, or following the same system expecting the same results.
We know it does not hit consistently nor do the results happen consistently. Because it does not happen that way nor does playing MTT’s in this manner each day. However, players are expecting the same because for the most part they are playing the same, without an injection of intelligence in the moment just reaction
Working on this part will hopefully lead to channeling thoughts of divine feeling away from the table to experience the search of existence beyond ourselves, and then channel the feeling at the table. Psychology offers conditions for philosophy to use, understand when the movements match the feeling of the divine. This unconscious competence of thought knowing the moves, feeling the dynamics of each individual because knowing the dynamics in previous sessions that now have matched in the moment.
Being an existence of a feel player, the feel can be moved to a model of learning this new existence of feel then would be the first stage of existence to understanding new information away from the table then feel would be also the first stage of intelligence to use at the table from learning new knowledge that is yet to be applied in the moment until it moves into the second stage that becomes the first stage of poker intelligence at the table. One step closer to mastery of just on stage of poker, and as the merry go round continues, and so does the existence of learning poker.
It is better to stay on the rainbow than to find the pot of gold because the rainbow is a continuous circle with no pot of gold; the pot of gold has another place and will need other thoughts to achieve the proper movements. We only see the horizon and just a part of the actual rainbow, but have injected a pot of gold in the end because of how the horizon breaks our view of the circle. I am working on viewing the entire rainbow as a way to explain my existence at the table.
This is a draw game, a high degree of abstract thought is needed, timing, mental capacity to understand how, when, where, and why to invoke mistakes, anticipate our own mistakes, as well as recognize routine situations that will either end with a negative or positive outcome, these situations define most of a player’s own mortality within an MTT tournament. Psychology offers conditions of conflicts that repeat themselves by the way the community cards that produce combination draws on the flop for example, straight and flush draws, then how do players react to board texture, play their hands for one pair against certain texture boards as further examples of these psychological conflicts.
Away from the table we can build the perfect system typed nice and neat on paper because all probability, all possibilities can become actuality. However, at the table it is the opposite of how we discuss MTT tournaments away from the table in poker forums because the best information we can use is leaked for free, and this happens while observing the moment over and over, moment to moment.
We make important short term decisions for the long run of the game, but the opposite is what this player observes every day by my opponents in the micro stakes MTT’s. The mistakes made each day in a game that could be described as a game that is inherited with mistakes by the very design whether this was intentional or not it still happens.
Leveling situations happen with players representing certain board textures that look the same as made hands or strong combination draw hands because of how players will play their draws, second best hands with marginal kickers, as a couple of examples. These conflicts that look the same, make up a great deal of post flop play that is flawed when considering flipping hands pre flop and then no mistakes are made after turning the cards over.
The brain has a very hard time trying to pull up the right memory when both types of memories have both good and bad results attached with them, but people use the good memory to chase without filling in the blanks first? Ultimately what is the brain processing properly that would allow the player to continue? If both situations look the same however, since being stuck the player still has to make a choice and players feel they need chips chasing an unmade hand against a made hand.
Some situations offer the unmade hand no value after hitting their hand because all the money went in first without any thought about how many bets are needed after they make their hand? Each time a hand is made with no value of extra bets to be gathered then this mistake will have tentacles that will reach other parts of their game. This situation still has an ultimate decision still to be made? Do not let opportunity go by even though; it could be the opposite result of the initial decision in theory? Or always chase the chips?
Having to think of the opposite, play the opposite, this process is not natural for the brain to perform in our poker sessions because the brain is looking to pattern its own existence from repeatable routines to help to understand its own reality not to think the opposite of what is true. This type of thought process is not natural for the brains natural existence within the game of poker, but now the brain has to resist routines of pattern memories; and to use opposite memories of poker moments to exist consistently in a opposite poker reality.
Looking to understand the opposite of how people play and being better at understanding abstract thoughts that translates to play at the table of observing the opponent in the moment. Practice of this mental thought process helps my abilities to counter system thinking about value of starting hands, the probabilities of possibilities and for the system to exist consistently, properly it will still take another movement to see this actuality. The same probability of possibilities that takes a movement of thought to invoke mistakes within their own system of thought of a system to play MTT is what this player is consuming to unleash on opponents.
However, hypocrisy of systematic thought is still applied from my own thought process in this entire post against systematic thinking but only to systematically dismantle a system that the brain is imposing on the player to follow because of how ethics will help create anxiety within their game. This happens when the player any player will put themselves in psychological conflicts of thought about their system that have a first and second ethics perhaps more levels of ethics of systematic thinking along with the ethics of the system will eventually produce a moment that can be exploited.
This player will recognize the conditions from which psychology offers about their thinking, this leads to knowing how situations are going to be bet, played, and then apply philosophy to realize what they have because philosophy will get closer to the truth, the absolute, closer to the root of the moment to then make the proper movement because of each having its own individual proper movement, proper place just as a puzzle has each piece in its proper place.
For example, I realized I do not have a fear of death but rather anxiety about death because of not knowing how or when my own mortality will happen. Just like in an MTT my game does not have fear of death, but rather anxiety of how and when it is going to happen because of how rare it is for us to win our last hand of an MTT. My game recognizes anxiety of moments within opponents in this same process of abstract thought about my opponent(s).
Fear and anxiety have their own proper place and movement within my thought process. When this concept is not in its proper place then this concept can plunge thoughts into the Abyss, this Abyss will also lead the player back out again, back to nothingness of thought in which all thoughts are pure again all seems right for the brain to make decisions again properly.
What happens for the brain when playing is the concept of anxiety from which poker puts the brain in these moments over and over? How do we improve to be better with our movements to be consistent within our game in spite of knowing the concept of anxiety of how the brain will deal with its own mortality? Then having to make poker decisions each day, each stage, each final table, each final decision of, each last potential hand, and about the unknown; the vastness, abstractness of poker?
When my brain, game performs consistently everything else will take care of itself relieving my brain from having to face anxiety consistently that comes from the un-known, not understanding abstract thoughts of an abstract game, how this is applied in the moment, and this allows for freedom of thought, that will help my game in the moment to perform to the best of my abilities.
What use to be anxiety for the brain to function poorly now becomes a nothing for it to perform in the moment with confidence without anxiety because of the quiet mind of nothingness? My game does not have to prove my truths or truths of others but what is false about my truths or the truths of others in the moment at and away from the table. The actuality of this is the “self” struggling with its own mortality within the game of poker, the Concept of Anxiety?
We know it does not hit consistently nor do the results happen consistently. Because it does not happen that way nor does playing MTT’s in this manner each day. However, players are expecting the same because for the most part they are playing the same, without an injection of intelligence in the moment just reaction
Working on this part will hopefully lead to channeling thoughts of divine feeling away from the table to experience the search of existence beyond ourselves, and then channel the feeling at the table. Psychology offers conditions for philosophy to use, understand when the movements match the feeling of the divine. This unconscious competence of thought knowing the moves, feeling the dynamics of each individual because knowing the dynamics in previous sessions that now have matched in the moment.
Being an existence of a feel player, the feel can be moved to a model of learning this new existence of feel then would be the first stage of existence to understanding new information away from the table then feel would be also the first stage of intelligence to use at the table from learning new knowledge that is yet to be applied in the moment until it moves into the second stage that becomes the first stage of poker intelligence at the table. One step closer to mastery of just on stage of poker, and as the merry go round continues, and so does the existence of learning poker.
It is better to stay on the rainbow than to find the pot of gold because the rainbow is a continuous circle with no pot of gold; the pot of gold has another place and will need other thoughts to achieve the proper movements. We only see the horizon and just a part of the actual rainbow, but have injected a pot of gold in the end because of how the horizon breaks our view of the circle. I am working on viewing the entire rainbow as a way to explain my existence at the table.
This is a draw game, a high degree of abstract thought is needed, timing, mental capacity to understand how, when, where, and why to invoke mistakes, anticipate our own mistakes, as well as recognize routine situations that will either end with a negative or positive outcome, these situations define most of a player’s own mortality within an MTT tournament. Psychology offers conditions of conflicts that repeat themselves by the way the community cards that produce combination draws on the flop for example, straight and flush draws, then how do players react to board texture, play their hands for one pair against certain texture boards as further examples of these psychological conflicts.
Away from the table we can build the perfect system typed nice and neat on paper because all probability, all possibilities can become actuality. However, at the table it is the opposite of how we discuss MTT tournaments away from the table in poker forums because the best information we can use is leaked for free, and this happens while observing the moment over and over, moment to moment.
We make important short term decisions for the long run of the game, but the opposite is what this player observes every day by my opponents in the micro stakes MTT’s. The mistakes made each day in a game that could be described as a game that is inherited with mistakes by the very design whether this was intentional or not it still happens.
Leveling situations happen with players representing certain board textures that look the same as made hands or strong combination draw hands because of how players will play their draws, second best hands with marginal kickers, as a couple of examples. These conflicts that look the same, make up a great deal of post flop play that is flawed when considering flipping hands pre flop and then no mistakes are made after turning the cards over.
The brain has a very hard time trying to pull up the right memory when both types of memories have both good and bad results attached with them, but people use the good memory to chase without filling in the blanks first? Ultimately what is the brain processing properly that would allow the player to continue? If both situations look the same however, since being stuck the player still has to make a choice and players feel they need chips chasing an unmade hand against a made hand.
Some situations offer the unmade hand no value after hitting their hand because all the money went in first without any thought about how many bets are needed after they make their hand? Each time a hand is made with no value of extra bets to be gathered then this mistake will have tentacles that will reach other parts of their game. This situation still has an ultimate decision still to be made? Do not let opportunity go by even though; it could be the opposite result of the initial decision in theory? Or always chase the chips?
Having to think of the opposite, play the opposite, this process is not natural for the brain to perform in our poker sessions because the brain is looking to pattern its own existence from repeatable routines to help to understand its own reality not to think the opposite of what is true. This type of thought process is not natural for the brains natural existence within the game of poker, but now the brain has to resist routines of pattern memories; and to use opposite memories of poker moments to exist consistently in a opposite poker reality.
Looking to understand the opposite of how people play and being better at understanding abstract thoughts that translates to play at the table of observing the opponent in the moment. Practice of this mental thought process helps my abilities to counter system thinking about value of starting hands, the probabilities of possibilities and for the system to exist consistently, properly it will still take another movement to see this actuality. The same probability of possibilities that takes a movement of thought to invoke mistakes within their own system of thought of a system to play MTT is what this player is consuming to unleash on opponents.
However, hypocrisy of systematic thought is still applied from my own thought process in this entire post against systematic thinking but only to systematically dismantle a system that the brain is imposing on the player to follow because of how ethics will help create anxiety within their game. This happens when the player any player will put themselves in psychological conflicts of thought about their system that have a first and second ethics perhaps more levels of ethics of systematic thinking along with the ethics of the system will eventually produce a moment that can be exploited.
This player will recognize the conditions from which psychology offers about their thinking, this leads to knowing how situations are going to be bet, played, and then apply philosophy to realize what they have because philosophy will get closer to the truth, the absolute, closer to the root of the moment to then make the proper movement because of each having its own individual proper movement, proper place just as a puzzle has each piece in its proper place.
For example, I realized I do not have a fear of death but rather anxiety about death because of not knowing how or when my own mortality will happen. Just like in an MTT my game does not have fear of death, but rather anxiety of how and when it is going to happen because of how rare it is for us to win our last hand of an MTT. My game recognizes anxiety of moments within opponents in this same process of abstract thought about my opponent(s).
Fear and anxiety have their own proper place and movement within my thought process. When this concept is not in its proper place then this concept can plunge thoughts into the Abyss, this Abyss will also lead the player back out again, back to nothingness of thought in which all thoughts are pure again all seems right for the brain to make decisions again properly.
What happens for the brain when playing is the concept of anxiety from which poker puts the brain in these moments over and over? How do we improve to be better with our movements to be consistent within our game in spite of knowing the concept of anxiety of how the brain will deal with its own mortality? Then having to make poker decisions each day, each stage, each final table, each final decision of, each last potential hand, and about the unknown; the vastness, abstractness of poker?
When my brain, game performs consistently everything else will take care of itself relieving my brain from having to face anxiety consistently that comes from the un-known, not understanding abstract thoughts of an abstract game, how this is applied in the moment, and this allows for freedom of thought, that will help my game in the moment to perform to the best of my abilities.
What use to be anxiety for the brain to function poorly now becomes a nothing for it to perform in the moment with confidence without anxiety because of the quiet mind of nothingness? My game does not have to prove my truths or truths of others but what is false about my truths or the truths of others in the moment at and away from the table. The actuality of this is the “self” struggling with its own mortality within the game of poker, the Concept of Anxiety?