Try playing 6 or 7 tournaments at the same time w/o synchronized breaks. It sucks!! (or like some of the MTT regs.,... play 15-20 mtt's at the same time). Trust me.. synchronized breaks are a good thing.
Try playing 6 or 7 tournaments at the same time w/o synchronized breaks. It sucks!! (or like some of the MTT regs.,... play 15-20 mtt's at the same time). Trust me.. synchronized breaks are a good thing.
Synchronised breaks are a great idea, imo. I can finally spend my poker evenings like a normal human, come out of my room, get a snack and say hello to my family occasionally. Used to be that I was glued to my chair for ~5 hours straight because I was playing more than one game and the breaks didn`t coincide.
The problem now is that there are still some of the big networks that haven`t picked up on the idea (eg. Ipoker, Ongame), and one feels increasingly discouraged from playing their games because of the annoyance of having one that is out of sync.
I think it may be one of the reasons for the decline in the number of players playing regularly on Ipoker.
Most of their guaranteed tournies have lost alot of value in the past month or 2.
pee breaks & synchronised breaks = less mess
This is why I hate them. But, I can see how those who are multi-tabling would appreciate it!I guess that's my problem. I very rarely multi table tourneys. That, and I have a laptop, so I can go smoke, pee, get food, drink, etc.. whenever I feel like.