ChuckTs said:the average 'made hand' is 2 pair i think; mathematically i think it's between a pair and 2 pair
the average starting hand is Q7, the computer hand
So, If I have an AA to start, it is going to need some help for it to beat the average winning hand. AA alone is "not" a winner.
ChuckTs said:the average 'made hand' is 2 pair i think; mathematically i think it's between a pair and 2 pair
the average starting hand is Q7, the computer hand
No there aren't - someone could sort hundreds and thousands of hand histories into order, with a Royal Flush at the top and 7 High at the bottom, and find the mid point winning hand.clarkyballs said:the average winning hand with 10 players is not 999. it is something that can't be calculated. if you were to set some parameters...like all players stay in every hand to the river...you could come up with something, but that really has no value. there are way too many variables to calculate such a thing.
beardyian said:On one of the 2 poker channels we have here - i may be wrong - but i believe one of the presenters once said the "average" starting hand in NoLimit Hold-em with 10 players was in fact J-3os
And the winning hand was a set of Jacks
Now there may be differing factors involved but that was the claim.
IanT.