SNGs - what's the best number of seats??

gord962

gord962

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Total posts
1,648
Chips
0
I play the 45 player SNGs and I have had quite a bit of success. In the last 6 SNGs I have entered, I have finished 1st, 4th, 4th, 1st, 3rd and 3rd.

I knew quite a few of you play the 9 seat SNGs and I was wondering if any of you find an advantage by playing a single table SNG or is a larger number of players advantagous as it pays more positions and the prize pool is bigger.

Thoughts???
 
Kenzie 96

Kenzie 96

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 21, 2005
Total posts
13,686
Awards
9
US
Chips
156
I normally play the shorthanded SNG's, & have been playing the Turbo's lately. Pays 2 spots, don't last 2 long & fairly easy to cash. Harder to set aside enough time for larger SNG's for me. When I have the time usually try MTT freezeouts.
 
ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
i like to play the 6-handers because they finish within a couple hours and you get results quicker.
the 45 seaters are fun too, but they take much longer, and are harder to place in.
10 seaters are a good way of practising switching gears, and serve as a good happy medium for me :)
 
gjshand

gjshand

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Total posts
278
Chips
0
I play almost exclusivly 6 seat SNG's, much more skill involved in short-handed play and more folk than you would think are oblivious to the importance knowing and inderstanding this. (Basically more fish at the short handed tables)

10 seat tables still have this element once the numbers drop but bear in mind some folk just can't change gears at the right time. Some players at the 10 seat tables accumulate chips, find themselves in the final 4 or 5 and play like they have been because they figure they are doing in right.
 
gord962

gord962

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Total posts
1,648
Chips
0
I have won a few of the 45 seaters and never made it to the 2nd break. I find that they go quite quick and I it's quite easy to get into the top 7. I also find that for the extra bit of time over the smaller seaters, you are getting a MUCH better return on your dollar.
 
KerouacsDog

KerouacsDog

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Total posts
9,410
Chips
0
Christ Gord, looking at your placings in the 45-seat SnG's I would say you're playing at the right tourney size for you. Great results!
 
mickennium

mickennium

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Total posts
36
Chips
0
I tend to do mainly 6 seaters and the odd mtt freezeout...never play rebuys at all these days
 
3

3dpokersource

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
May 10, 2006
Total posts
4
Chips
0
It depends how much time I have. If I have a while I prefer the 45 mans, as most sit n go players at the lower limits are inexperienced, so it is still fairly easy to money. For quick sit n goes you can't beat 6-handed.
 
G

GLG-man

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 8, 2006
Total posts
128
Chips
0
I like the 9 player SNG's for consistency however the payout's are fairly small so you need to be patient. The 180 player one's are quite appealing that have shown up on pokerstars now, very big payouts for the top few places!!


G-man
 
Top