Originally Posted by billatx
1)I would gladly 3bet 33 from blinds most of the time against late openers,but i would never call without 150+ BBs effective stacks,or a multiway pot.
2)I would rather 3bet KQ from the blinds against late openers.I 'd never call.
*)After i 3bet from blinds,a cbet is coming on the flop most time.That is easily +EV.
Your logic is flawed. What is the point in starting a thread asking questions and then when players more experienced than yourself you just argue?
Instead of posting a question, why not write up a theory essay on why you way is the best in the first place.
If somebody has say a 40% ATS, then KQ will dominate hands in that range far more often than it is dominated.
A 40% range looks roughly like this in poker stove:
So in this example we are dominated by AQ, AK,and QQ+ - I think that should be 36 combos due to our blockers.
Now lets see what we dominate: K2s-KJs, Q4s-QJs, Q8o-QJo, K7o-KJo. That is a lot more hands my friend. I'm not going to bother counting them up for you.
And maybe its true that YOU can't profit from flatting small pp's in the blinds but that by no means does not mean that it isn't possible. You only need to throw in the odd successful bluff with a pp that missed a set to make up for the times that you don't get paid off when you do hit a set.