nc_royals
Visionary
Silver Level
Does anyone else here show better results at a higher buy-in than they do a lower one.
For example Im showing a profit and stats look much better at .10/.25 than they do at .05/.10 cash table.
I think part of the reason is at the higher game I give more credit to the players and their hands and dont try to make moves. I always think for some reason i can get a person off a marginal hand at the lower stakes. Plus when I play the bigger table Im usually just one tabeling it. Unlike the .05/.10 table where i might play anywhere from 2 to 4 tables.
Anyways, just wondering if anyone else is seeing the same thing.
Thanks
For example Im showing a profit and stats look much better at .10/.25 than they do at .05/.10 cash table.
I think part of the reason is at the higher game I give more credit to the players and their hands and dont try to make moves. I always think for some reason i can get a person off a marginal hand at the lower stakes. Plus when I play the bigger table Im usually just one tabeling it. Unlike the .05/.10 table where i might play anywhere from 2 to 4 tables.
Anyways, just wondering if anyone else is seeing the same thing.
Thanks