Does anybody actually like this rule?

[Staneff]

If u know u have best hand it`s a must to raise. If u dont think u got the best hand u can check-raise so if he fold u win; if he call u win/lose ; if he re-raise u can call/fold.
Checking the nuts is rly risky to not win more chips than the pot is cuz if ur opponent check too u dont get max chips u can steal from him. Otherwise if u check and ur opponent raise pretending he has the best hand u r in rly good position got re-raise or call if u think this is enough amound of chips to get from that hand.

 

[rzepa1881]

U check with a full house. In my oppinion u should bet like 60%of pot

 

[T_slu4ay]

i didnt ever heard about such rule on wsop! are you sure it is?

 

[uninformed]

I understand that it is an indicator of possible collusion, but I can also see that the owner of said nuts may prefer checking so as to see the other hands that are still in play.
Regardless of the above I don't think anyone should be able to tell you how to play your hand.

 

[S3mper]

The thing is it's not really an indicator of collusion... No one cheats like that. It was a rule made by people who don't understand poker

 

[ssbn743]

^^