Dara OKearney
Poker Pro
Silver Level
Always! That’s the dream. Many successful careers have been started that way.Hi Dara.
Is it recommended to try our luck in satellites to hope to win a big ticket or a package one day ?
Good luck!
Always! That’s the dream. Many successful careers have been started that way.Hi Dara.
Is it recommended to try our luck in satellites to hope to win a big ticket or a package one day ?
There is a correct strategy, which is to consider each "step" as its own separate satellite to the next. That maximises your chances of making all the way, even if as you say it's still a long shot. But all you can do is play your best and shorten those long odds as much as possible!Hello Dara ,
Is there a good strategy for step sats ??
i see some sats they have 4 or 5 or 6 (or even more !!!) steps before you win the target (expensive) ticket . I struggle to win in even one sat , although i like them (cheap entry in case you win ) , so winning 4 or 5 or 6 or more in a row seems impossible (plus every next step rewards fewer tickets for the next step ..... ).
Thank you
Very much so. Examples of just how much can be found in my book "PKO Poker Strategy"Hi Dara, I hope you are well.
Do we have to widen our calling range in knockout tournaments to be profitable ?
Thank you !
Before I was a poker player I was a chess player. Chess tournaments are generally organised on what's called the Swiss system. After round one, people who won their first game play each other in round two, people who drew the first match play someone else who drew, and losers play other losers. After round two people who won both their first two matches play each other, and so on. This is an excellent way of ensuring players end up roughly where they should be by the end of the tournament. If you make a fast start and win a couple of close matches, you have to face tougher opposition you're likely to lose to, whereas if you lose two close matches at the start you're much more likely to win your third match against a player who has also lost their first two matches.Hi Dara,
There have been multiple occasions where I have managed to satellite into another satellite for a larger tournament, but then fail dramatically on the second satellite. I feel that when I do this online, the odds are against me, but not sure why.
Is there anything you can recommend? (Bare in mind that I do not change my play style between 1st and 2nd satellite tournaments)
Thanks ✌🏼
I could write a book on this (wait, I did, it's called "Poker Satellite Strategy")I usually got frustrated in satellites and i dont know how to play it correctly what tips can you say for amateur players and how can u approach this tournaments to have a better winning porcentaje?
Start with low buy ins and play very loose aggressive!hello) please tell me how best to start playing knockout?)
This is correct. Late in satellites even when you have a strong hand, you generally want everyone to fold to your shoves, so choose spots where this is more likely.Good afternoon! Dara, I haven't read your books because of the language barrier. I re-read the entire thread of questions and answers here on the forum, learned a lot of new and interesting things about playing in satellites. Did I understand correctly that unlike multi-table tournaments, in satellites it is much more important to use the position at the table? Especially when playing in hyper tournaments, where there is no time to wait for a suitable hand.
Assuming you mean a normal tournament rather than a satellite, it very much depends on your stack. With a short stack you should be playing push or fold and tight, as getting into the money is your main priority.Hi dara, how are you? I wanted to ask you how do you play the bubble? Since normally with a big stack , I rushed to get chips and ended up losing before I exploded , because I was anxious not wanting to let cards pass . Thank you
Calm. You're trying to survive, not win all the chips!You are aggressive when playing a satellite or playingvery calm?
thank you very much and started playing the last time 💪Start with low buy ins and play very loose aggressive!
thank you very much, that's how I started playing the last time 💪Start with low buy ins and play very loose aggressive!
Yes. Strategically it's the same when you play against a short stack as when you are the short stack.You go all in when their stacks get short
Yes there is. If the entire prize pool is bounties just add a starting stack for each starting bounty when you cover the other playerHello. Tell me please is there a big difference between strategies during the tournament with prizes only for KO and tournaments when the part of prizes is guarantee pays.
I played satellites when I had spare time (no other event at that time I wanted to play). I'd already won a satellite for the main online.Hello Dara,
I saw that you are at the WSOP? are you playing any satellites while you are there or just buy in directly into the events that you play?
GL
I wrote a blog on this here: http://dokearney.blogspot.com/2022/11/tools-of-trade.htmlHello.
What poker tools do you use and what poker tools, in your opinion, should be in the arsenal of every player?
I think it's a reasonable strategy for beginners which will minimise tricky post flop spots but as you get experienced you definitely want to add more nuance!-Question:
What's your opinion on Phil Hellmuth's advice for beginners in tournaments about "playing only the top-15 starting hands, AA-22 , AK-AQ and maybe KQ"?
Facing aggressive opponents is good news for two reasons:Hello nice to meet you. I have a question how do you approach in satellites versus agressive players? And if u enjoy playing satellites?
Just play them like a normal tournament. You can't lose if they're freerolls. I built my initial online bankroll in freerolls.Hello Dara.
I'm an amateur player, and I only play freerolls, my question for you:
It's worth playing the free satellites that Pokerstars offers to win tickets to other tournaments, as these satellites are very popular.
If so, what would be a good strategy, as these tournaments usually have a large number of players.
Grateful Cesar.
It's definitely fine in micro stakes where it's unlikely you won't be exploited. I use that strategy myself at the lowest stakes I play.In micro stakes satellites, what is your view of having an unbalanced limping strategy; playing only premium hands this way to exploit opponents?
Thanks