How many players do you prefer to have the table?

[Igor Popadyk]

my opinion is that it’s more important how many fish are at the table, because if you don’t see fish at the table, then there are fish

 

[Mr_Cloud]

I switch between the two

 

[jcxmendes]

For me, the ideal is 8 players, 8 or 9 players!

 

[dzsire]

I prefer 8-9 players at one table.
The fewer players at a table, the greater the pressure to play, even with the junk cards.

 

[luckyfish98]

7 players is good, not 9, even less than 7 is good

 

[odonob]

6 I suppose, most MTTs are 9 so there is no choice most of the time. A lot of cash tables have 6 players but I find cash too difficult to make any money at.

 

[Baoka]

6 person table is best rotated quickly, many are too time-consuming

 

[Cerniera]

Hy, I prefer with max 8 players because 9 players is to much and I lose my concentration and 6 players it s a few players.
How do you prefer?

3-4 players for my .

 

[Paya_31]

Hello, in a tournament I prefer 9 or 8 players, the game progresses faster, the players are eliminated, in order to win the tournament, for a cash game I prefer 6 players because it is more dynamic and here it is different, the players are not eliminated . but they buy back those who are playing.

 

[German629]

In the late time I don't care especially, how many players for the table or the tables, because on the present time I play the different kinds of Poker,
starting with Heads-up, continue Spin&Go, Cash Games and the different types of tournaments! That are the cases!

 

[oskarsbaumanis2]

I would like 7 players because when the blinds increase and the ante increases, the pot is good, etc

 

[Comboss599]

8 or 9 players at the table is fine. 6 I simply don't like. I use to play also S&G so 3 players is good for me.

 

[Stringy]

6 or 3 is my fave, 9 is ite for big tournamemts

 

[ficticius]

To me, where I have had the best results, they have been at tables with six players and they are the tables that I like the most

 

[steve01991]

just me standing at the final table, but honestly, 9 is fine.

 

[Claudiunm]

An interesting question. Personally, I only play tournaments. If it's NLH, I prefer tables with 9 players. If it's Omaha, I prefer with 6.

 

[Baoka]

6 people is enough, the fewer the more likely it is to win

 

[Roobz75]

Online, I don't mind the maximum 9, because its all virtual.
In real life, I prefer 6 because 9 is too much of a squash and takes too long to go round the table and you end up sitting on the blinds, when they have just gone up.

 

[Like2Play2]

I always play tournaments with 8 to 9 people at the table.

 

[Chebchoub]

Hy, I prefer with max 8 players because 9 players is to much and I lose my concentration and 6 players it s a few players.
How do you prefer?

I do not think that the number of players at the table makes a significant difference in the probability of winning or losing. However, the cards dealt to you, your position at the table, and the extent of your mastery of skills and strategies are what determine the final result.
I prefer 6 to 9 players.

 

[Viparida]

For mtt 9 players it´s cool, i think. I think it´s because i´m already used to play with this number of people.

 

[TeUnit]

I rather play full ring and be able to play more games.

 

[odonob]

6 players for a quicker turnaround of hands. 9 players combined with too long time banks can really drag. I think that there should be a maximum 15 second time bank. 60 seconds is far too long with multiple players.

 

[Rosylly]

8-max for me, maybe because it's the most common.

 

[Rob Hobson]

Anyway.