Stick66
Legend
Silver Level
I'd stay out of it if I were you.Is this a level if not the irony is redirkulous.
I'd stay out of it if I were you.Is this a level if not the irony is redirkulous.
What part of "slowplaying is bad" don't you understand? Does it really appear to you that I am "siding with" a slowplayer? I think you need a dictionary and a reading comprehension course, son.
And you think throwing a fit is OK? Fine, Zachy. You go through life thinking whining like a little baby is the professional way to handle things. You go ahead and think that cussing someone out is the professional way to handle things. You go ahead and go through life not caring about making yourself look bad by throwing a hissy. Just keep thinking that Tiger doesn't look like an ass when he cusses people out.
And while were at it, you just keep crapping on people here on Cardschat and thinking nothing will come of it. You're a real professional. Did you stat this out like you do everything else? Then I think your stats are wrong because I'm not taking your crap anymore.
Put that in your Hold'em Manager!
hypothetical Annette said:No need to slowroll just because I'm better than you
saying back where I come from said:Sticks and stones can break my bones but words can never hurt me
And while were at it, you just keep crapping on people here on Cardschat and thinking nothing will come of it. You're a real professional. Did you stat this out like you do everything else? Then I think your stats are wrong because I'm not taking your crap anymore.
5 minutes is probably extreme but this is hardly a slow roll. it isn't like mercier has the nuts here, and although yes she isn't folding here in a million years that doesn't mean one cannot think about the decision. After all it is a pretty big buy in tournament.
No need for the comments in any case (pot calling the kettle black tho as i let some ppl have it).
Dude, you obviously are clueless to what you've been doing here and the novel you just wrote proves it. You are zeroing in on instances instead of seeing the big picture. And I'm serious about the dictionary. You really need to look up the word "slander". So since you just don't get it, I guess I'll have to spell it out for you:Honestly, are you like specifically on some vendetta against me? wtf did I ever do to you? First in the joke thread where bw and I jokingly said some words. That one you may have had a point. Maybe it was a bit immature, but I personally thought it was funny, not in that we were cursing each other out but because we knew each other and support thought we were actually talking all that shit in a low-stakes tourney (again, no offense to people who play those buy-ins, but most chops are the high stakes MTTs. Not very many people chop $5 single-table sngs, that's what I mean by low-stakes). I forget exactly what you said but something along the lines of grow up and not funny.
Then the post on The Poker Mindset, where I dare to offer a contrary opinion. You jump on me and say that a review has already been done and link to yours. I knew it was there, I read it before buying it. But that doesn't mean I can't have a differing opinion. There's people on the total opposite of the political spectrum having a pretty constructive debate/discussion in the lounge on the Preisdential race in the US and politics. I have a differing opinion on whether I like a book or not and you throw a hissy fit.
Then this. My point is: would you have a problem if she had said:
or is it the curse words? My point about it being true probably is with no history I'm thinking the only reason she slowrolled was because of who she was playing against. As in that statement is absolutely true. She just wanted to be able to talk about doing it against one of the best up and coming players today.
And if it's the cursing why is it so bad? They're just words. There's a saying back where I come from:
But for trying to say this I'm "crapping on you"?
Your statements about me being a stats-based player (whatever that means) or put that in your holdem manager? Obviously you have some kind of problem with me that goes beyond this.
And please explain to me what this means
I would like you to provide me with proof that I crapped on people here and also for you to clarify wtf you mean by "stat this out like you do everything else".
I don't know what beef you seem to have with me but frankly I'm tired of you slandering me every time I post with my opinion. If you knew me at all you'd know that I don't talk a lot of shit, I prefer to let my game do the talking. And yeah, I use holdem manager and I use stats, like basically the majority of this forum/serious poker players do. It doesn't mean it's the only thing I use, and it has nothing to do with the topic at hand (or the previous one where you mentioned it).
And to have the arrogance to say I'm "crapping on people here" while doing something that could easily be described as crapping on me is pretty gutsy. In my time here at CC I've had an argument with pretty much one other poster, and it was someone trying to claim that it was correct to make an unprofitable play. Other than that no one else has felt I was crapping on them. So please, explain your reasoning on how I'm crapping on "people here at Cardschat".
We have differing opinions, and apparently you hate people who use statistics in a heavily math-based game.
Guess it'd be a bit much to ask for an apology for the here for the unbased slander? Did you think nothing would come of it?
Board didn't pair until the river though, all the money went in on the turn.The board paired parker, only higher full house wins.
Well it won't be public. This thread needs to stay on topic as of now.
Princeton dictionary said:[SIZE=-1]words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another
[/SIZE]
It doesn't say in the HH. Someone said in an earlier post that they read it was 5 min on a 2+2 thread. Personally, I doubt it was 5 min as I've never seen a time bank anywhere near that.
The timebank increeses with the buy-in.......It doesn't say in the HH. Someone said in an earlier post that they read it was 5 min on a 2+2 thread. Personally, I doubt it was 5 min as I've never seen a time bank anywhere near that.
It takes me awhile to think when I play poker so I'm sure I've been accused of this before also >_>
The problem is even if I have the nuts I still tend to have to make sure it really is. Because I've had times in the past that I thought I wouldn't be beat and got butchered.I guess my brain functions slower than some people.
not necessarily, annettes range was indeed wide but there were a few hands that beat her there and i dont think u can fault her for trying to analyse the situation in depthThis wouldn't be a problem. But she's a poker pro right? I'm pretty sure she knew what she had, knew she was crushing Annette's range, and knew she was gonna call as soon as Annette pushed.
annette got angry because annette is , the typical HS young poker player, a sour loser
her play isnt that bad tbh, mercier will fold a lot of her range, the A was the perfect card to bluff as well, mercier willl fold 77-KK and 55, its an advanced play that wouldnt work in a freeroll because freerollers are calling stations, as they say u can only bluff a good playerAll in on a pair of sixes and they are not even a pocket pair.
Christ if thats how the professionals play then I am not as far behind as I thought...
She had been called all the way so what did she think her opponent had ? 7 4 off suit ?
Her opponet could have had any number of hands at that time, so to throw everything in on a mediocre top pair seems suicide to me..
If I did that on a CC freeroll people would say I was crazy...