S
ScottishMatt
Legend
Silver Level
I think anyone value betting thin enough to fire 99 there can definitely alter sizing based upon his perception of our range.
"Snap-bet just means he didn't think about checking behind. So it can be air, monsters, anything he already knew he was going to bet."
"how he adjusts his sizing based on that. If he is even thinking about ranges at all."
These don't mix. If he is smart enough to know exactly how he is playing the next street, if he is prepared enough to have that plan in place, then surely he is capable enough of at least bet sizing accordingly.
Anyway, I'm not being results-oriented as I think it may still have been the correct play. He showed up with TT here, I feel that my river call is correct if he does the same thing when a J shows up - I'm speculating as to whether he does though. Like, I think he definitely bets when a J shows up and he has TT. He isn't spewy though. It's not what he did that makes me question my call - it's how he did it. He bet big, and he bet fast. Seems like he had a very easy decision and if we take away what we know about him (as you don't seem to put much weight into it anyway) and just generalise then it is probably a fold.
Again though, I'm happy with how I played it. I feel like calling river is fine most of the time, just that minute factors that I would normally overlook could be the factors that help me make a better decision in future spots.
"Snap-bet just means he didn't think about checking behind. So it can be air, monsters, anything he already knew he was going to bet."
"how he adjusts his sizing based on that. If he is even thinking about ranges at all."
These don't mix. If he is smart enough to know exactly how he is playing the next street, if he is prepared enough to have that plan in place, then surely he is capable enough of at least bet sizing accordingly.
Anyway, I'm not being results-oriented as I think it may still have been the correct play. He showed up with TT here, I feel that my river call is correct if he does the same thing when a J shows up - I'm speculating as to whether he does though. Like, I think he definitely bets when a J shows up and he has TT. He isn't spewy though. It's not what he did that makes me question my call - it's how he did it. He bet big, and he bet fast. Seems like he had a very easy decision and if we take away what we know about him (as you don't seem to put much weight into it anyway) and just generalise then it is probably a fold.
Again though, I'm happy with how I played it. I feel like calling river is fine most of the time, just that minute factors that I would normally overlook could be the factors that help me make a better decision in future spots.