2NL: Stars or FullTilt

[Garbaniuzas]

Stars. Much more options, many tables, and less waiting other players.

 

[taban13]

Probably still STARS there more people flow, and therefore a bigger fish.

 

[joe777]

I choose Pokerstar because there are lots of player there and less waiting time.

 

[magicius]

Hi all
I play poker for about a year mainly MTT but now i want to start playing cash games. I will naturally start with 2NL and try to grind it up...
Just wanted to know your opinion on where it is easier to make some profit. Pokerstars or FullTilt Poker?

Also you can add some details like: FR or 6max, zoom or regular, hour of day etc...

tbh none of above... yes ftp is a bit fishier,but if i was you i would try on smaller site (poker770,bet365,williamhill,888 etc)
player base is much fishier...
but if u want stars dont go on ****ing zoom!
its much different that reg tables... playing oop,hand ranges etc....
play 6max cause fr is nit fest....
also about time.... i would say during night 3am-10am gmt.... reason for that is that most eu players are sleepy and tired,while ru donks are in bed,so you have to fight south americans and north americans

Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk

 

[rytciaq]

Don't know why you say Full TIlt is fishyer. I think pokerstars is fishier, cause, I don't know in other countries, but in mine for example, there are EPT tournaments showed by television every Wednesday, and EPT is Pokerstars', so more new players come.

 

[doomasiggy]

Hi all
I play poker for about a year mainly MTT but now i want to start playing cash games. I will naturally start with 2NL and try to grind it up...
Just wanted to know your opinion on where it is easier to make some profit. Pokerstars or FullTilt Poker?

Also you can add some details like: FR or 6max, zoom or regular, hour of day etc...

Plays exactly the same on both sites, rush/zoom probs 0.01% nittier.

 

[magicius]

Don't know why you say Full TIlt is fishyer. I think PokerStars is fishier, cause, I don't know in other countries, but in mine for example, there are EPT tournaments showed by television every Wednesday, and EPT is Pokerstars', so more new players come.

Ept doesnt have to do anything with new players.... just 2nl is @ stars have bigger reg/fish ratio with more reg players than on ftp...
also this is my personal view from what i saw on both sites,thats why i said some minor sites are best....
i play on stars mostly cause of sngs...

Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk

 

[Fknife]

thats why i said some minor sites are best....

Minor sites are good for building a BR but I think that if you are serious about Poker you will have to switch to PS at some point.

i play on stars mostly cause of sngs...

And because of Zoom! From your posts and HH I see you really like this game and have lots of very positive memories about it Oh and don't forget about an enormous ratio of super nice and friendly RU do... I mean: players on PS!

 

[magicius]

Minor sites are good for building a BR but I think that if you are serious about Poker you will have to switch to PS at some point.



And because of Zoom! From your posts and HH I see you really like this game and have lots of very positive memories about it Oh and don't forget about an enormous ratio of super nice and friendly RU do... I mean: players on PS!

hahaha RU D..... all the waaaay zoom fking addictive.... but i enjoy most in sngs hypers and KOs
still thinking about bet365 cash account

Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk

 

[Aces2w1n]

For this pokerstars or full tilt...
Many people say that pokerstars is rigged, but both of them are gamble sites and they must have this option.
Just a example that there`s not difference between any poker site. This is in full tilt:
I got Q10. Flop is 6Q7 rainbow. I bet and 1 called pre-flop so we are heads-up. I checked on the flop. He shoved all-in and I called with top pair. He showed 23 off suit. Turn 3. River 2. I losed with Qs vs 2 pairs 2s and 3s. Cool right?

Anyway try FT try 6max and see yourself which one fits you. It doesnt rly matter. Some people choose 6 max so they dont need to wait 8 players full-time thinking should they fold their 72o or no.

GL

Perhaps you played against me lol... sounds like something sick I'd do though 23 I love at final tables and hitting hard. but I from time to time will slip in the odd hand for good measure.

 

[tomnovember]

Do not try PokerStars if you just want to earn some pocket money!!! Can you imagine tables full of squeezing, 3bet vs stealing, 4bet bluffing, floating, flop check raise bluffing in NL2? That's PokerStars!

 

[Rain92]

Do not try PokerStars if you just want to earn some pocket money!!! Can you imagine tables full of squeezing, 3bet vs stealing, 4bet bluffing, floating, flop check raise bluffing in NL2? That's PokerStars!

What makes you think Fulll Tilt is much better? In fact more solid players are there because the new player will obviously want to play in a bigger and high traffic site.

 

[tomnovember]

What makes you think Fulll Tilt is much better? In fact more solid players are there because the new player will obviously want to play in a bigger and high traffic site.

There are actually lots of regs in PokerStars, which are quite different from crazy fishes... Definitely PokerStars is much tougher than FTP...

 

[Rain92]

Must be due to the promotion of free 25$ on Full Tilt that's driving alot of new players there.

 

[Vazh93]

Go with Stars. Just be patient enough in table selection.

 

[xofedac5]

Personally, after playing both of them (and FT first before PS) I much prefer PS. Ppl say its rigged but you catch bad beats like that on any site. I mean, PokerStars isn't iPoker so there's a plus!

Full Tilt is just tilting... and you got more traffic with PS.