Poker Forum - Register
Play Online Poker Games at US Poker Sites - Get the maximum Full Tilt Poker Referral Code and PokerStars Marketing Code exclusively at Cardschat. Try online poker at Everest Poker, Ultimate Bet.
Party Poker Titan Poker PokerStars Bodog Pacific Poker
Go Back   Poker Forum > Poker Message Boards > Poker Strategies
Search

Online Poker Forum
Receive the maximum sign up bonus when using our exclusive Full Tilt Poker Referral Code CARDSCHAT.
Reply
  Poker - BB vs SB
 
  #1  
16-01-2008, 2:53 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
BB vs SB

One area that I'm quite unsure about is when it comes down to BB vs SB, everyone else has folded, and perhaps I have something terrible like 27os

1) Is it worth investing the same amount again to equal the BB, or even raise?

2) What do you guys do if the BB then raises or re-raises?

How about if I'm the BB and I have AJos, for example, someone in early position raises, everyone else including the SB folds, and that person in early position is betting really aggressively, how do you guys play that one?

These are situations that I quite often seem to find myself in during tournies, and I'm never sure what the best course of action might be
 

Bodog PokerBodog Poker is one of the few poker sites accepting US players that also offers a Sportbook and online casino games.

PokerStarsPokerStars is amongst the best poker sites online that accepts US players. Use PokerStars marketing code CARDSCHAT for an exclusive $75 bonus.

  #2  
16-01-2008, 3:09 AM
pigpen02
Bringin' home the bacon
 
Location: Albany, Georgia
Plays at: Full Tilt Poker & PokerStars
Likes: holdem
Posts: 2,922
1) No.
2) Moot.
C) Depends. Stack sizes, bet sizes, history, etc.
  #3  
16-01-2008, 3:15 AM
OzExorcist
Broomcorn's Uncle
 
Location: Australia
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: wild deuces
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWuckingFurries View Post
1) Is it worth investing the same amount again to equal the BB, or even raise?
Technically you're getting the right price to call with pretty much any two cards. But that assumes that the big blind will just check.

Also, you need to remember that you'll be out of position for the entire hand (unlike heads up play, where you'll have position after the flop to offset the weakness of your hand). It ain't a pretty situation.
  #4  
16-01-2008, 3:23 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
C) Depends. Stack sizes, bet sizes, history, etc.
Generally it's people with large stacks, often significantly larger than mine, so I would be out of the tourney if we went all-in and I lost
Quote:
Technically you're getting the right price to call with pretty much any two cards. But that assumes that the big blind will just check.

Also, you need to remember that you'll be out of position for the entire hand (unlike heads up play, where you'll have position after the flop to offset the weakness of your hand). It ain't a pretty situation.
So rather than a simple Pigpen02 "No" it would depend upon my assessment of whether my opponent is likely to simply check?
  #5  
16-01-2008, 3:38 AM
OzExorcist
Broomcorn's Uncle
 
Location: Australia
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: wild deuces
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWuckingFurries View Post
So rather than a simple Pigpen02 "No" it would depend upon my assessment of whether my opponent is likely to simply check?
Like many things in poker, the answer is a resounding "Well... sort of, it depends"

I'm actually borrowing a bit from heads-up theory here. The thing about playing heads up is this situation comes up every second hand, so you can have a much better idea of your opponent's tendencies in this situation - if they're just checking when you complete say, half the time, it's a worthwhile move.

At a full table, however, the situation comes up much less often so for starters you won't have anywhere near as good an idea what to expect from your opponent (unless they're an uber-rock or something).

Also, don't discount the positional consideration - you'll be out of position for the entire hand, and that's not really a place you want to be when you've got a weak hand. If you think you can outplay your opponent on the flop, with poor cards and poor position, then the price to complete with any two cards from the small blinds is probably a good one.

Otherwise... it depends
  #6  
16-01-2008, 3:42 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Haha thanks, so really it's probably a no a lot of the time, but maybe not as definite a no as Pigpen02 gave
  #7  
16-01-2008, 3:46 AM
OzExorcist
Broomcorn's Uncle
 
Location: Australia
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: wild deuces
Posts: 2,102
Put it this way - in this situation I definitely loosen my calling requirements, but I don't loosen them far enough to include complete garbage.

Others may play it differently, of course.
  #8  
16-01-2008, 3:49 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Yes well I deliberately specified the complete garbage hands, because it's those that when I dump them I wonder whether I'm missing out on a golden opportunity to make money from terrible hands...
  #9  
16-01-2008, 4:17 AM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
Small blinds, dump them unless you are pretty sure you can steal the BB. Even if you get in cheap you'll be playing the rest of the hand out of position, a huge disadvantage. In HU play it's correct to call because you have position post-flop.
  #10  
16-01-2008, 4:18 AM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
Of course if you're playing a really wild and aggressive player, but one that doesn't raise much preflop, I'd call and hope to hit a flop (2 pair, trips, straight, flush, or a combo draw). This gives us the implied odds since he will pay us off when we hit by betting at it hard.
  #11  
16-01-2008, 5:40 AM
Bentheman87
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 798
A good general guideline is if its folded to you in the small blind play any pair, any ace, any king, and decent Q, J10 or J9 and fold anything else.
  #12  
16-01-2008, 6:12 AM
WVHillbilly
Phelps of the Felt
 
Location: Almost Heaven
Plays at: Full Tilt
Posts: 2,159
I'm fairly aggressive in the SB if it's folded to me. I'll raise to 3x the BB with:
Suited - Any A, K, Q, J down to J7, and suited connectors down to 87
Offsuit - any A, K down to K7, Q down to Q8, and J down to J9.

This is basically a top 40% range. Basically I figure 60% of the time I have the best hand preflop and sometimes when I don't the BB will just call and fold to my bet post-flop (almost always c-bet here). If the BB reraises and my hand is not a top 10% type hand I'll just fold.

Of course, my M will definitely factor in to what I do.
  #13  
16-01-2008, 3:37 PM
juiceeQ
Get Some
 
Location: Jackson, CA
Plays at: Poker Stars
Likes: NL Holdem
Posts: 12,412
As it has been said already, as with most things in poker, the answer depends solely on the situation. If I'm going to complete the small blind with a less-than-desirable hand, I'm playing off my reads. Something like 7/2 os is something I am typically folding, unless I know that I can easily push my opponent off his hand/blinds. In this case, I'm playing the player, not the cards. But there is NO WAY I'm commiting my stack with a hand like this. Any aggression or resistance from my opponent, I'm folding.

So yeah, it really does depend (although, until you have solid reads, you should be dumping hands like 7/2os ).
  #14  
16-01-2008, 11:02 PM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Although I completely agree with post 13, posts 12 and 11 are probably more useful to me at the moment, simply to give me a rough guideline. As I become more confident in my ability to read opponents I can concentrate more on the situational side of things, but I don't think I'm at that stage yet...

Really useful thread for me so far, thanks for the input, and other opinions obviously very welcome
  #15  
16-01-2008, 11:51 PM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWuckingFurries View Post
Although I completely agree with post 13, posts 12 and 11 are probably more useful to me at the moment, simply to give me a rough guideline. As I become more confident in my ability to read opponents I can concentrate more on the situational side of things, but I don't think I'm at that stage yet...

Really useful thread for me so far, thanks for the input, and other opinions obviously very welcome
Well if you're not confident in your reading abilities, guidelines of hands won't help you. It's not which hands you play, it's how you play them. People use all sort of sets of hands to play. Some stick to just premiums and some play any 2 cards. You need to be able to play the cards well to play them, so a rough guideline will not apply to everyone. People (like WV did) can give their personal range, but unless you are able to play them well, that's no help to you.
  #16  
17-01-2008, 12:16 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
I have to say that I respect your opinion very much zachvac, you're a superb poker writer, and a lot of your advice in threads here I have found very useful, but I strongly disagree with two things you just said:
Quote:
Well if you're not confident in your reading abilities, guidelines of hands won't help you
I've been playing about six weeks, won a few cheap tournies and some freerolls, but my skill/experience/knowledge of the game is very low. I know how I work best, and these guidelines will definitely help me...
Quote:
People (like WV did) can give their personal range, but unless you are able to play them well, that's no help to you.
I don't have to be able to play them well for it to help me, at the moment I am winning tournaments but lacking self-confidence and in-depth knowledge, having a rough idea of how some more experienced players might play the hands is very useful for me

If you look at posts 11 and 12 there are two people giving their personal guidelines (not one), their guidelines are remarkably similar, and I can therefore reasonably deduct that quite a few other people would also use similar guidelines. Even if I try it out and it doesn't work for me, at least it gives me a starting point in an area where I currently feel totally lost

I'm not coming here as a total novice and suddenly expecting to be a brilliant poker player, I need to take it one step at a time, and I wonder whether you appreciate just how much of a novice I actually am, and can relate back to when you yourself were that inexperienced

Having said that, I am grateful for you taking the time to post...
  #17  
17-01-2008, 12:34 AM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
ok sorry maybe I was a bit harsh, and I think I misunderstood your motive. From what I read I thought you basically wanted set hands to use and you could just play them like a robot and suddenly expect to be better. Apparently I assumed wrong and I apologize.

Now from my standpoint in terms of hands. Although I in general play relatively loose preflop, I play loose with position and thus hate getting into marginal spots when no matter who I'm playing against I'm out of position. So I will fold most hands from the SB unless I'm sitting next to an extremely tight player and it's folded around to me. I'm raising with pocket pairs, A9+, KJ+, and suited connectors. This is certainly not a strict range. If there's an extremely loose aggressive player who will re-raise with a wide range of hands, I'll fold KQ and if there's a player I think will fold to a cbet if they miss the flop I'll loosen up further, possibly playing any ace or even K-rag. It depends on the image of the opponent and your image in this situation.
  #18  
17-01-2008, 12:37 AM
WVHillbilly
Phelps of the Felt
 
Location: Almost Heaven
Plays at: Full Tilt
Posts: 2,159
I think you're fine. Just the fact that you're here asking questions puts you miles ahead of a ton of players.

You asked initially what you should do with hands like 27 or similar. Everyone basically said the same thing; fold. What Zach is saying is no matter what hands you decide to play, it will be how you play them that will determine whether you are ultimately successful. What juiceeQ said was that the better you know how the BB plays, the better off you'll be. All very true and very good advice. If the BB is some calling station I may fold Ax because unless I hit my Ace, I know post flop he may call me to the river with bottom pair. Similarly if he is very weak I may raise with 45os because more often than not he'll fold preflop and if he doesn't I'll know I'm crushed without a miracle flop.
  #19  
17-01-2008, 12:43 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Thanks zachvac, it's really useful to have another player's guidelines to bear in mind

Anyone feel like sharing a bit more advice about the second part of my OP, please:

How about if I'm the BB and I have AJos, for example, someone in early position raises, everyone else including the SB folds, and that person in early position is betting really aggressively, how do you guys play that one (in a tournament)?
  #20  
17-01-2008, 12:52 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
What Zach is saying is no matter what hands you decide to play, it will be how you play them that will determine whether you are ultimately successful
and I agree with that 100%, a medium-term aim of mine is definitely to improve my reading of other players, and I already have a database I created of people I have played against, which I refer to during tournies. I am also busily reading posts here about TAG, and LAG, and how to play various types of hands - but it's a lot to take in all at once

However, in the short term I can use the rough guidelines posted here and try some of them out, and see how they pan out for me. Then at least I can feel a little more confident that I'm not completely screwing it up, or missing golden opportunities for low-risk profit...
  #21  
17-01-2008, 12:58 AM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWuckingFurries View Post
Thanks zachvac, it's really useful to have another player's guidelines to bear in mind

Anyone feel like sharing a bit more advice about the second part of my OP, please:

How about if I'm the BB and I have AJos, for example, someone in early position raises, everyone else including the SB folds, and that person in early position is betting really aggressively, how do you guys play that one (in a tournament)?
Again, this depends. Personally if I'm playing someone very aggressive, I'll come over the top here. If he raises I can fold knowing that I'm probably dominated. If he flat calls, reads come into play again. Will the opponent fold to a cbet if he missed the flop? Also since you mentioned tournaments it depends on where you're at in a tournament. If you're playing early on and there are still a lot of loose donks, I fold this. You're out of position, you can't put your opponent on a hand, wait for a better spot where you know you're ahead when you get your money in. If you've got a short enough stack you may have to raise all-in here. If a big hike in money's coming up and you're close to the bubble but not below the cutoff for the money hike this is an easy fold.
  #22  
17-01-2008, 1:11 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
I tend to play tight for the first hour (unless it's some kind of super-turbo), or the first two hours if it's the Bodog thousand dollar freeroll, but I have heard that aggression is very important later in a tournament, and I'm looking for places I can introduce aggression without taking unnecessary risks - if that's actually possible!
  #23  
17-01-2008, 1:31 AM
pigpen02
Bringin' home the bacon
 
Location: Albany, Georgia
Plays at: Full Tilt Poker & PokerStars
Likes: holdem
Posts: 2,922
I missed the discussion, but it seems that almost everybody agrees that garbage hands in the small blind need to be folded. The question is where hands start to become worth calling or raising. That is a personal choice and my requirements are different than WVHillbilly's, but close.

My requirements for betting against an initial raise preclude playing AJo from the big blind. I would vie with a pair 77 or better, AK or AQs.
  #24  
17-01-2008, 2:09 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
My requirements for betting against an initial raise preclude playing AJo from the big blind. I would vie with a pair 77 or better, AK or AQs.
In my mind I tend to think of 77/AK/AQs as being quite a bit better than AJo - is there a table somewhere that actually lists the relative values of different starting hands? I use the link on this page quite a lot, but I'm not sure how kosher their betting advice is
Quote:
If a big hike in money's coming up and you're close to the bubble but not below the cutoff for the money hike this is an easy fold.
Sadly I'm such a n00b that I haven't yet worked out what "the bubble" means
  #25  
17-01-2008, 10:29 PM
switch0723
Skadoosh
 
Location: Fight Club
Posts: 4,020
I have never understood why people are so aggressive on the sb vs the bb. In a full ring usually 1 person has a good hand, therefore if it folds around to you in the small blind, the big blind will have a hand as often as he wont. So i only want to be comnig into the pot first to act with j,t+ and with a raise, i never limp in blind vs blind
  #26  
18-01-2008, 1:43 AM
EthanVK
Junior Member
 
Location: Northern California
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: all forms
Posts: 20
is this in tournament play or cash game?

if in tourny, it all depends on how big the blinds are getting and how big stack sizes are.

in a cash game i would fold 90% of the time unless i had knew i could out play this particular opponent with garbage.
  #27  
18-01-2008, 2:05 AM
zachvac
2 More Years
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: NL Hold 'em
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by switch0723 View Post
I have never understood why people are so aggressive on the sb vs the bb. In a full ring usually 1 person has a good hand, therefore if it folds around to you in the small blind, the big blind will have a hand as often as he wont. So i only want to be comnig into the pot first to act with j,t+ and with a raise, i never limp in blind vs blind
This is bad logic. It's like saying well you should get AA 1 in 221 times and since the last 220 times I haven't gotten it I'll most likely have it this time. Slightly different logic, because you're right the odds increase because garbage hands are being folded, but they don't increase as much as you seem to be implying. I'd say he gains maybe a few percentage points when everyone else folds (well he doesn't gain, I'm saying his odds from your POV go up of him having a good hand).
  #28  
18-01-2008, 2:22 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
is this in tournament play or cash game?
Tournament play
  #29  
18-01-2008, 7:34 AM
juiceeQ
Get Some
 
Location: Jackson, CA
Plays at: Poker Stars
Likes: NL Holdem
Posts: 12,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWuckingFurries
Sadly I'm such a n00b that I haven't yet worked out what "the bubble" means
This is the cut-off to the money spots. Let's say the tournament you are in pays to 20 places, and you bust out in 21st place, you "bubbled".
  #30  
18-01-2008, 4:05 PM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
This is bad logic. It's like saying well you should get AA 1 in 221 times and since the last 220 times I haven't gotten it I'll most likely have it this time. Slightly different logic, because you're right the odds increase because garbage hands are being folded, but they don't increase as much as you seem to be implying. I'd say he gains maybe a few percentage points when everyone else folds (well he doesn't gain, I'm saying his odds from your POV go up of him having a good hand).
Also presumably if what matters is how you play the hand, and what your opponent THINKS you have in your hand, then the BB could be thinking along the same lines, that you may well have a great hand?
Quote:
This is the cut-off to the money spots. Let's say the tournament you are in pays to 20 places, and you bust out in 21st place, you "bubbled".
Thanks It's also quite frustrating when the poker site gives you a pop-up saying "Well done, you've defnitely won a prize!", you continue playing for another hour or so before you're finally knocked out, and then you find out you've actually only won about 12 cents
  #31  
18-01-2008, 8:31 PM
Katie Kards
Aspiring Member
 
Location: Boston
Plays at: Poker.com
Likes: PLO Hi
Posts: 82
Said it well:
it depends
  #32  
20-01-2008, 1:32 AM
NoWuckingFurries
CardsChat Regular
 
Posts: 1,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie Kards View Post
Said it well:
it depends
Whilst that is undoubtedly true, it's not necessarily the sort of detailed and constructive advice that I need right now
Reply
  Poker Forum > Poker Message Boards > Poker Strategies


Display Modes

PokerStars
WORLD'S LARGEST POKER SITE - US PLAYERS ACCEPTED AT POKER STARS

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 3:03 AM.


Sitemap: 1 2 3

Copyscape   Poker En Ligne Online Poker Poker Online
All original site contents ©Cardschat.com 2004-2008. Reproduction is prohibited.