Poker Players Alliance Speaks Out Against California Poker Bill Amendment

3 min read

 Poker Players Alliance California
The Poker Players Alliance opposes a California online poker bill amendment that would ban PokerStars for at least five years. (Image: Google)

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) wants nothing to do with a recent amendment to California online poker bill AB 2863. The readjusted proposal would ban any poker site that operated in the United States while it was illegal for the first five years.

That, of course, would mean PokerStars wouldn’t be able to join the party since it was a major player in the pre-Black Friday era in America.

The last-minute amendment was made in order to give the bill a better chance to pass through the state’s Assembly at a potential Monday vote. But the amendment has some strong opposition, including the PPA.

PPA Advice

In a Thursday press release, the PPA urged lawmakers to reject these amendments. The organization said the restrictions would leave players dissatisfied and make AB 2863 less likely to pass.

“We are deeply disappointed that Chairman Adam Gray has chosen to play politics at the behest of special interests. The proposed amendments threaten to doom the iPoker legislation for which we and our members have advocated for years,” John Pappas, executive director of the PPA, said. “Since the Internet poker debate began in California nearly ten years ago, PPA has been the only consistent voice urging lawmakers to license and regulate Internet poker.

During this time, our message remained consistent: protect consumers and promote competition. Unfortunately, some of Chairman Gray’s proposed amendments undermine this principle.”


The amendment, at first glance, would ban sites such as PokerStars for the first five years. But, according to the PPA, a closer look indicates it would actually be a lifetime ban. The organization also stated that the amendments will force poker players in California to wait even longer to play online due to the small chance the bill passes.

This argument contradicts what Adam Gray’s chief of staff, Trent Hager, told the Los Angeles Times recently.

“This deal should secure two-thirds vote in the Assembly,” he said in an email. “It will be fairly well received in the Senate.”

The original bill has faced some stiff competition from powerful American Indian tribes that don’t want PokerStars to operate in California. These tribes are now less likely to support an online poker bill that excludes PokerStars.

But that doesn’t mean Hager is correct in his assumption. Amaya Inc., PokerStars’ parent company, has some powerful partners in the Golden state, including Commerce Casino. Needless to say, passing this bill has become a battle of which side can be the most persuasive.

In March, PokerStars reentered the US market for the first time since Black Friday in April 2011, but only in New Jersey. The biggest online poker brand would love to operate in California, the largest state in the country. But, due to stiff political opposition, that isn’t likely to happen any time soon.

Related Posts

Did you know about our poker forum? Discuss all the latest poker news in the CardsChat forum

Popular Stories