The fate of online poker in California took a knock earlier this week after the Pechanga Tribe and eight of its allies decided to rescind their support (read: neutrality) of Adam Gray’s AB 431 bill.
Up until late last week the Native American tribe hadn’t been opposed to Gray’s proposal and was broadly aligned with PokerStars and its closest California ally, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
However, in a letter to the Appropriations Committee dated May 21, the tribe and its allies confirmed they will no longer be supporting the bill now or at any stage.
According to a tweet by Chris Krafcik, the group believes AB 431 would be “directly counterproductive to any iPoker efforts” within the state.
PokerStars Wants to Protect Players
In defense of the bill, the PokerStars/Morongo coalition directed its own letter to the Appropriations Committee a day later, outlining the benefits of Gray’s proposed legislation.
Using the argument that regulated online poker would mean a safer environment for players, the letter is a clear attempt by the two bodies to distinguish regulated iGaming from illicit sites that currently offer services to California poker players.
“Authorizing online poker will be good for millions of consumers and poker players who will benefit from a safe, regulated, commercial gaming environment where they are protected. Every year that California fails to act not only puts consumers at risk while playing online games from offshore localities,” read the letter.
This isn’t the first time the Pechanga Tribe has turned its back on Gray’s legislation.
In the early stages of is lobbying efforts, Gray was forced to make some last minute changes in order to satisfy the demands made by a coalition led by Pechanga.
Disagreements on All Sides
When the initial hearing took place Pechanga stated its position as neutral; however, this neutrality has now switched to outright opposition.
According to the letter addressed to the Appropriations Committee, AB 431 would do little to advance iPoker regulation in California as it fails to address some of the main disagreements between the relevant parties.
As it stands, the Pechanga led coalition sit in opposition to PokerStars/Morongo and the horseracing/labor coalition and, until these parties can agree terms, the chances of regulation being passed look slim.
Although most are agreed that regulation is a good thing for the state, the financial implications of who gets what and which side owns what stake in the industry are a major sticking point.
With AB 431 being heard on May 27, the landscape of what may happen in the coming weeks should become a little clearer. However, in all likelihood, talks of regulation will probably continue moving at a less than desirable pace.