Personally, I like hyper turbo poprq so much time is not wasted. you just have to have a little luck in the first hands to grow your chips

Originally Posted by Chicungulla

Personally, I like hyper turbo poprq so much time is not wasted. you just have to have a little luck in the first hands to grow your chips

Slow for sure!

I prefer the slower tournaments bc the end game where all the money is decided is deeper and has less luck involved. Interesting that everyone can have different opinions and thats why they have all the different formats

Bountybuilders,like to get money staright away when you knockout someone and six max hyper turbo tournaments.I play 7 dollars 6 maxes

Regular/slow. I think you have more time to act.
In a hyper-turbo MTT you have nothing post-flop action.

I love playing long game tournaments as I find you have more hands to go through then the turbo games.

I like hyper turbo only when it comes to sit & go, I prefer tournaments at normal speed

Originally Posted by JJP

I prefer the slower tournaments bc the end game where all the money is decided is deeper and has less luck involved. Interesting that everyone can have different opinions and thats why they have all the different formats

I prefer the slow tournaments for this same reason, but end up playing hyper most of the time, due to a lack of time on my part.

I play hyper for fun. Turbo when i don't have much time to play and Slow when i want to play a good poker. Slow is my preference.

I enjoy the slower tournaments more. I feel like it offers more decisions to be made and lets the skill of the game shine through more. The faster ones although fun, feel as though it gets too limited on decision making once the blinds get to a certain level. There is less nuance to it, but if you're trying to save time and still need your poker fix they are definitely the way to go.

Hyper is mostly luck. The problem is you can play much more hyper tournaments in a time frame but even if you are a great player, your advantage will be much smaller than in a normal tournament. They are good for training certain skills like red zone playing but in general I don't like them. Sometimes I play turbo S&G, they also require a lot of luck but they give quite a good balance between speed and proper gameplay. As for MTT I play only regular. Even turbo is too much for me. It still takes a lot of time to finnish one but it requires so much luck that I don't find it entertaining. Regulars also require luck but during first 2-3 hours you need to play good poker at least.

I love playing tournaments. I love playing tournaments tipsy after Sunday Brunch, who's with me?

1. As $/hour
hyper > turbo > normal > slow
2. As edge
slow > normal > turbo > hyper
3. As variance, needed roll
hyper > turbo > normal > slow
4. As "fun"
hyper > turbo > normal > slow

What I prefer? I don't know...I prefer to not play poker. If it is possible... I hate the poker. So much...

Hyper and turbo are the best for me Other takes way too long, I dont like it

Currently I'm playing turbos MTT , i find them very fun to play and they are fast.
I used to play slow tournaments but after you play a turbo or a hyper turbo , it's kinda hard to return to slow tournaments . Turbo and hyper tourneys are good if you are grinding them , they are little bit high variance but you can earn more $/h .

I prefer turbo tournaments inside the MTT, sometimes I play sit n go. I prefer the game to spin fast.

Regular i suppose, from 8 to 10 minutes between blinds level up.

I like slow tournaments more, because if good hands don't come, there is always an opportunity to improve your position in the tournament.

It depends. I like fast games cause Players have not enought time for think and they make much more fails.

Each one has a different strategy, the slow ones are of more skill than the rest, the turbo ones are push and fold knowledge, and the hyper ones are a lottery,I prefer the slow ones.

Probably turbo. With hyper many times you will be blinded out without decent card and slow are too long for me. Best would be mix of those, slow at the beginning, turbo in the middle and hyper at the late phase.

Regular and sometimes turbo...Normal ones give me more time to think...

I prefer the slow tournaments and freezeout, more time to recover from a bad move.

I prefer regular tournaments 10 minutes between each blind

My favorites are turbos and hyper turbos. They have a quicker outcome unlike tournaments with a normal structure

I like slow play. For me it's very relaxing game. Don't like hiper it's too fast and you must risk and go all in very often to get chance to be on the top.

some ACR tournaments have over 5 hours late registration which is ridicules even though its a mirco, I anit trying to play a $3.30 3k for 10 hours thank you.

I like hyper tournaments. Because I don't have the ability to concentrate, so for a long time.

Originally Posted by Chicungulla

Personally, I like hyper turbo poprq so much time is not wasted. you just have to have a little luck in the first hands to grow your chips

Turbo are just about bearable but hyper-turbo, no way. I prefer slow play and deep stack but these are few and far between.

I like to play Hyper Turbo! And hate long late registration period!

It depends a lot on the tastes of each one. I personally like regular tournaments because it allows me to calmly think about each hand, besides that you can expect to have better hands

I prefer slow as I like to think deep on what I am playing. Turbo does not give you an opportunity to think enough. So therefore, I say that I do enjoy playing in a slow tournament. Good luck to you all!

Beatlebug

Personally, they are all good, they all have a lot of variance, what distinguishes them is that the preflop ranges vary, for example the hyper I play with a too wide range, almost any regular paid pair, I select a turbo Little more preflop tangos and not just any paid hand, and of course the slowest ones I play very conservative when choosing to get into a hand, I mean very tay I play and pay only with premium .. generally personally they are all excellent ,, Of course I comment because I love poker ,,, so patience and persecerance ,, do not pay to lose friends. luck ....

I prefer to play fast tournaments, that there is not so much late registration and with few chips at the beginning, simply so that the tournament does not become so long, and at the same time, I think that if you can manage to build up chips at the beginning you have a good chance of winning a prize.

I think 7-8 minute blinds are perfect for the tournament. It's not that slow like regular tournaments and not that fast like hypers/turbos.

I love the normal pace of the game. All hyper and turbo tournaments are not normal. I believe that such tournaments should be excluded from all rooms, because this is not real poker.

I like slow tournaments, hyper turbos are more for playing the lottery !!

Slow tournaments are a little better for me. I usually drop out quickly in the turbo ones.

It is very difficult to play in the turbo structure, the BBs burn out before our eyes. I like to play an average 12 minutes BB, no one is in a hurry, you can study the players. It takes a long time but it's worth it)

I prefer regular 8-10 minute blind increase tournaments.

I prefer the slower tournaments. a lot more time to analyze the board's, players, and your not rushed by the timer's and BB's being eaten away

The slower, the better.

Originally Posted by Rob Hobson

The slower, the better.

That's what she said lol

I really like slower one's too, less variance and more time to make hands. If you go hand dead for awhile in a hyper you are done for.

Many years of experience in the game shows that what we like at the beginning of training eventually loses its interest-so I can't say with absolute certainty that I like MTT.In fact, any tournament can arouse interest, especially if you pass ITM in them.

my favorite tournament is slow because you have time to wait good cards.

Originally Posted by pjokay

That's what she said lol

Lol

I prefer turbo

turbo perfect
and if a good bankroll, then hyperturbo is also not bad

bountybuilder defently, always action and u can stay focused