AKQ
Legend
You'l hear in advanced study Poker,
the term "The solver likes to do this"
Well Lets give it What it wants!!
I find it funny,
because we know this, flop tendency, of a light cbet,
we should wonder, if we can ever actually do what it wants in an exemplary fashion.
So even though the solver wants to raise preflop
That action goes against the effectiveness of the solvers theory of betting as small as possible on the flop
Its as if it has different conflicting strategys within itself
The solver interface doesn't show the computer playing
and it doesn't pick 1 choice of action it picks multitudes against range
But like all good SuperVillians
Deep in my secret lab
I have seen the solver become a nueral network,
Pluribus was born
Pluribus played/won a cash game against Joe Hachem and other 7 Pros
It opened with a solid range and good sizing
(which is cash game logic.. think about it.... bet to get value from weaker hands that might call)
So I realized we need to give it what it wants at its core
Not what we have demanded from it
and just like a good Supervillian parent first we have to tell our kids NOOO and then teach em
And in the end we both teach eachother right?
AS an MTT family,
Lotta chash game logic needs to go away forever
So by having a strict limping policy preflop
We can run the solver on almost any spot postflop
and it will give you the same answer
bet 1
but you'll say you often see the solver wants that bet size even if we raise preflop
by why is this 1
MEGA different than betting 1 after raising preflop 2.2?
Pot sizing is smaller 3BB instead of 6
Bet is larger in comparison to the pot 33%
the opponent is less committed
the opponent has less shove /squeeze value
Less chances your BB opponent will want to raise preflop due to being out of position ,when all they have to do is check to see the flop.
Solver bets 1 in position 100%flop
But to check,
when an opportunity to realize high equity on a further street appears.
Having the Superpower to get to the turn ,in a 3 bb pot,in position 90% of the time
We get to see our equity and we get 2 streets of information from our opponent
PLUS the flop check induces a skilled false read from our opponents
So we are getting more value either way, even if we hit or dont,
We get an opportunity to rebluff for a much better pot, than if we first stole it on flop with 1 BB,
PLUS we get to see the opponents bet sizing and make a read or even fold losing that 1 BB we invested
so now we get to the river
This is where me, ABC,Exploitative ,GTO,The Solver and Pluribus have a butt naked party
We have all 5 cards dealtwhilst in position with our entire range camoflauged. We have streets of information
We also have an image
I know this and so does Pluribus and GTO
GTO does various smart sizing mixed shots
Pluribus drinks the whole bottle and bets 2x pot with both value and bluffs
Exploitative would choose a sizing based on what our opponents might have and call down
but I like the option of 1-2BB's on the river
Pluribus and The solver DONT
Y?
it doesn't get bottom pair to fold or even ace high sometimes!!
GTO can do it better and remove even more of his calling range with bigger bets.
Pluribus is so full of shit he has to bet 2x pot to bluff anymore,
but picks alotta good pressure spots and applies
SO to give it everything it needed
I took away the preflop
the unneeded risk
and abused player tendency's preflop by doing so
So on the flop
Bet 1
or check and realize equity or whatever lol
the term "The solver likes to do this"
Well Lets give it What it wants!!
I find it funny,
because we know this, flop tendency, of a light cbet,
we should wonder, if we can ever actually do what it wants in an exemplary fashion.
So even though the solver wants to raise preflop
That action goes against the effectiveness of the solvers theory of betting as small as possible on the flop
Its as if it has different conflicting strategys within itself
The solver interface doesn't show the computer playing
and it doesn't pick 1 choice of action it picks multitudes against range
But like all good SuperVillians
Deep in my secret lab
I have seen the solver become a nueral network,
Pluribus was born
Pluribus played/won a cash game against Joe Hachem and other 7 Pros
It opened with a solid range and good sizing
(which is cash game logic.. think about it.... bet to get value from weaker hands that might call)
So I realized we need to give it what it wants at its core
Not what we have demanded from it
and just like a good Supervillian parent first we have to tell our kids NOOO and then teach em
And in the end we both teach eachother right?
AS an MTT family,
Lotta chash game logic needs to go away forever
So by having a strict limping policy preflop
We can run the solver on almost any spot postflop
and it will give you the same answer
bet 1
but you'll say you often see the solver wants that bet size even if we raise preflop
by why is this 1
MEGA different than betting 1 after raising preflop 2.2?
Pot sizing is smaller 3BB instead of 6
Bet is larger in comparison to the pot 33%
the opponent is less committed
the opponent has less shove /squeeze value
Less chances your BB opponent will want to raise preflop due to being out of position ,when all they have to do is check to see the flop.
Solver bets 1 in position 100%flop
But to check,
when an opportunity to realize high equity on a further street appears.
Having the Superpower to get to the turn ,in a 3 bb pot,in position 90% of the time
We get to see our equity and we get 2 streets of information from our opponent
PLUS the flop check induces a skilled false read from our opponents
So we are getting more value either way, even if we hit or dont,
We get an opportunity to rebluff for a much better pot, than if we first stole it on flop with 1 BB,
PLUS we get to see the opponents bet sizing and make a read or even fold losing that 1 BB we invested
so now we get to the river
This is where me, ABC,Exploitative ,GTO,The Solver and Pluribus have a butt naked party
We have all 5 cards dealtwhilst in position with our entire range camoflauged. We have streets of information
We also have an image
I know this and so does Pluribus and GTO
GTO does various smart sizing mixed shots
Pluribus drinks the whole bottle and bets 2x pot with both value and bluffs
Exploitative would choose a sizing based on what our opponents might have and call down
but I like the option of 1-2BB's on the river
Pluribus and The solver DONT
Y?
it doesn't get bottom pair to fold or even ace high sometimes!!
GTO can do it better and remove even more of his calling range with bigger bets.
Pluribus is so full of shit he has to bet 2x pot to bluff anymore,
but picks alotta good pressure spots and applies
SO to give it everything it needed
I took away the preflop
the unneeded risk
and abused player tendency's preflop by doing so
So on the flop
Bet 1
or check and realize equity or whatever lol
