I’ve been thinking some more and my reasoning above is flawed.
If i have 0 cEV per game i will lose all the rake because i dont make profit. In the formula above it doesn’t take rake into consideration correctly. So i thought about it some more and think this is better:
ROI = ((n*b+100*c(e/w)-n*r)/(n*b))-1
N = number of games
B = buy-in per game
C = average amount you cash for whithout rake
E = cEV per game
W = amount of chips needed to win the game
R = rake per game
An example (like the one above):
N = 100 games
B = 0.25 $
C = 0.75 $ (instead of 0,69, which is rake oncluded)
E = 70
W = 1000 (spin and go)
R = 0.02 $
((25 + 5,25 - 2) / 25) - 1 = 13%
If we change C to 20 cEV per game we’ll get -2% ROI. Which seems like a better answer than with the formula in my post above.
Any thoughts?
__________________
|