yes I understand your point of view and it is valid, but remember you are having a very one-sided view, TAG players will also make the same move with some bluffs using your image, so soon it is not the style that should vary but the balance between values and bluff in the style he plays, when you change your style of play it will be easier for you to fumble with what you are doing than to fiddle with your opponent. The same is true for LAG players, they will actually have a wider range of hands that will enter, but the values they will play in the same way is what makes opponents confuse and not change the style. For example, a lag player increases all the time playing against me, when he decides to play passively I already notice that there is something wrong and I give up on the hand, I think you should better evaluate your reading about players, do not confuse LAG with fish or TAG with NIT think that improving the identification of your opponents will make your life much easier. And the question that does not want to be silenced how to play against calling staions?In my opinion there is no precise scheme to eliminate calling stations - they usually do it themselves. The tight aggressive player will only play premium hands anyway and they will also play them aggressively with high raises or 3-bets preflop and sufficiently large bets on flop, turn and river. The loose aggressive players have a wider hand range and also play medium pairs, connectors and suited connectors in the right context. Finally when a calling station pays all bets on the flop, turn and river with - for example - bottom pair will certainly lose all chips against opponents top pair at some time, the same will happen if they play with suited cards and running for a flush which does not happen always, they lose their all-in bluff on the river against opponents top pair, 2 pairs or a flopped set. A calling station may win a lot of chips in the early phase by gambling or bluffing but lose all chips later if not being able to change the style of play.
I am not a very aggressive player, although I think that I play aggressive or passive depending on each situation and with my little experience I do not think it is convenient to always play aggressive many times I choose how to play when I have a certain time playing against the same players, my strategy against this type of player is to be patient, wait for the right moment and follow my instincts
Hello players!
The world of poker is like the "sea" no matter how much you study and keep up to date, it's always on the move.
In my opinion and in the face of various reports from professionals and studies I decided to adopt a very aggressive posture. However I'm not sure if being aggressive is so advantageous, I have noticed the increase in players who play in a very passive way entering several hands of lmp and flat and adopting a calling station with draws but also doing slow play with the premium range, "bringing a balance of range in this sense.
I would like to know your opinion and also ask what is the best way to play against calling stations and slow players?
Hello players!
The world of poker is like the "sea" no matter how much you study and keep up to date, it's always on the move.
In my opinion and in the face of various reports from professionals and studies I decided to adopt a very aggressive posture. However I'm not sure if being aggressive is so advantageous, I have noticed the increase in players who play in a very passive way entering several hands of lmp and flat and adopting a calling station with draws but also doing slow play with the premium range, "bringing a balance of range in this sense.
I would like to know your opinion and also ask what is the best way to play against calling stations and slow players?