Sick to my Stomach

[SHERMSTICK]

pokerstars Game #9936155176: Tournament #50007604, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level XII (800/1600) - 2007/05/16 - 00:01:05 (ET)
Table '50007604 89' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 2: amhudcol (41956 in chips)
Seat 3: sandram61 (25582 in chips)
Seat 4: mizzoubake (12566 in chips)
Seat 5: fsu2010 (15071 in chips)
Seat 6: SPTRick813 (2085 in chips)
Seat 7: JCagey (51319 in chips)
Seat 8: CLSHERM (66540 in chips)
Seat 9: DTdogg (26225 in chips)
amhudcol: posts the ante 75
sandram61: posts the ante 75
mizzoubake: posts the ante 75
fsu2010: posts the ante 75
SPTRick813: posts the ante 75
JCagey: posts the ante 75
CLSHERM: posts the ante 75
DTdogg: posts the ante 75
CLSHERM: posts small blind 800
DTdogg: posts big blind 1600
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to CLSHERM [8d 8c]
amhudcol: folds
sandram61: folds
mizzoubake: folds
fsu2010: folds
SPTRick813: folds
JCagey: raises 2400 to 4000
fsu2010 said, "mizzou was pushing lightly"
CLSHERM: calls 3200
fsu2010 said, "havnig 8 bbs"
DTdogg: folds
*** FLOP *** [Ah 7s 8s]
CLSHERM: checks
JCagey: checks
*** TURN *** [Ah 7s 8s] [Qh]
fsu2010 said, "yes but i make more money than you"
fsu2010 said, "im a better player than you"
CLSHERM: bets 6400
fsu2010 said, "and you're an idiot"
fsu2010 said, "have a nice day"
JCagey: raises 6400 to 12800
CLSHERM: calls 6400
*** RIVER *** [Ah 7s 8s Qh] [7c]
CLSHERM: bets 16000
JCagey: raises 18444 to 34444 and is all-in

SHERMSTICK

 

[SHERMSTICK]

Still Sick

PokerStars Game #9936953396: Tournament #50007604, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level XV (2000/4000) - 2007/05/16 - 01:00:15 (ET)
Table '50007604 89' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: woodeneye (90547 in chips)
Seat 3: sandram61 (151979 in chips)
Seat 4: livliz (44622 in chips)
Seat 5: brazen2000 (58828 in chips)
Seat 6: Obiwan48 (49698 in chips)
Seat 7: MoeJoeJoeJoe (12502 in chips)
Seat 8: CLSHERM (78324 in chips)
Seat 9: MannyD13 (77360 in chips)
woodeneye: posts the ante 200
sandram61: posts the ante 200
livliz: posts the ante 200
brazen2000: posts the ante 200
Obiwan48: posts the ante 200
MoeJoeJoeJoe: posts the ante 200
CLSHERM: posts the ante 200
MannyD13: posts the ante 200
woodeneye: posts small blind 2000
sandram61: posts big blind 4000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to CLSHERM [8h 8c]
livliz: folds
brazen2000: raises 54628 to 58628 and is all-in
Obiwan48: calls 49498 and is all-in
MoeJoeJoeJoe: folds
CLSHERM: calls 58628
MannyD13: folds
woodeneye: folds
sandram61: folds
*** FLOP *** [6c Qs Jd]
*** TURN *** [6c Qs Jd] [Ts]
*** RIVER *** [6c Qs Jd Ts] [5s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
brazen2000: shows [As Th] (a pair of Tens)
CLSHERM: shows [8h 8c] (a pair of Eights)
brazen2000 collected 18260 from side pot
Obiwan48: shows [Ah Kh] (a straight, Ten to Ace)
Obiwan48 collected 156094 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 174354 Main pot 156094. Side pot 18260. | Rake 0
Board [6c Qs Jd Ts 5s]
Seat 1: woodeneye (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: sandram61 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: livliz folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: brazen2000 showed [As Th] and won (18260) with a pair of Tens
Seat 6: Obiwan48 showed [Ah Kh] and won (156094) with a straight, Ten to Ace
Seat 7: MoeJoeJoeJoe folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: CLSHERM showed [8h 8c] and lost with a pair of Eights
Seat 9: MannyD13 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)

SHERMSTICK

 

[robwhufc]

1st one - why? Did you lose? Did you fold?

2nd one - why? Did you think 88 was a strong enough hand to call 2 all ins?

 

[Stick66]

1st one - why? Did you lose? Did you fold?

2nd one - why? Did you think 88 was a strong enough hand to call 2 all ins?

Sherm, I'll put the "nice filter" on Rob's post since his seems to be broken. Translation:

HH 1) Seems to be missing the part that you are sick about. What happened in the end?

HH 2) Looks like a bad play on your part, Bud. You usually don't want to call 2 all-ins with 88. Even if you read them as total maniac donks, the strength of your middle pair is diminished by having 2 others in the pot and not just one.

 

[Vintage82]

PokerStars Game #9936953396: Tournament #50007604, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level XV (2000/4000) - 2007/05/16 - 01:00:15 (ET)
Table '50007604 89' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: woodeneye (90547 in chips)
Seat 3: sandram61 (151979 in chips)
Seat 4: livliz (44622 in chips)
Seat 5: brazen2000 (58828 in chips)
Seat 6: Obiwan48 (49698 in chips)
Seat 7: MoeJoeJoeJoe (12502 in chips)
Seat 8: CLSHERM (78324 in chips)
Seat 9: MannyD13 (77360 in chips)
woodeneye: posts the ante 200
sandram61: posts the ante 200
livliz: posts the ante 200
brazen2000: posts the ante 200
Obiwan48: posts the ante 200
MoeJoeJoeJoe: posts the ante 200
CLSHERM: posts the ante 200
MannyD13: posts the ante 200
woodeneye: posts small blind 2000
sandram61: posts big blind 4000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to CLSHERM [8h 8c]
livliz: folds
brazen2000: raises 54628 to 58628 and is all-in
Obiwan48: calls 49498 and is all-in
MoeJoeJoeJoe: folds
CLSHERM: calls 58628
MannyD13: folds
woodeneye: folds
sandram61: folds

As above, but your leaving yourself with <5x BB too?

 

[joosebuck]

easy call on first. 2nd im too drunk to analyize

 

[alan1983]

im guessing he had quads in first?

Tough beat.

But 2nd is a very bad call imo.

 

[joeeagles]

Yeah, 2nd hand you should have folded. All-in raise with 1 caller you can't put 75% of your stack in there with 88. Your M is 10, you don't need such a risk yet.

If you lost the 1st hand (what happened?) that's a heartbreaker, would be enough to send me on tilt. You played it very cool not shoving the turn and getting him to put his whole stack in there on the river. Like I said, a heartbreaker...

 

[dj11]

When I make stupid moves, I get sick to my stomach too.......

 

[Stefanicov]

2nd was purly a bad call by you 88 is never good enuff to call off most of ure stack with 2 previous all ins. tbh is an easy fold you were well chipped and had no need to take the risk. Btw great result last night congrats

 

[SHERMSTICK]

Thx for Comments

Hey Guy's:


I lost the first hand because he had QQ an caught his Q on the turn, an the Second one- Hell a few hands later catch'em again an was in dis-believe that I could lose twice with them being so closely. I do see everyone's point on letting them go, since two caller's ahead of me with all-in, again thx.

SHERMSTICK