no limit sit and go's

[tigertight]

HOW WOULD YOU PLAY THIS AND DID I PLAY TOO AGGRESSIVE
pokerstars Game #11584658993: Tournament #58778508, $1.00+$0.20 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2007/08/19 - 23:27:14 (ET)
Table '58778508 1' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: TutuB (1485 in chips)
Seat 3: PokerGM2 (1450 in chips)
Seat 4: LONE STAR64 (1455 in chips)
Seat 5: ME (3080 in chips)
Seat 6: footprint666 (1500 in chips)
Seat 7: Rockman43 (1570 in chips)
Seat 8: MontyDJ (1460 in chips)
Seat 9: swedox (1500 in chips)
me: posts small blind 10
footprint666: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to me [Tc Ts]
Rockman43: folds
MontyDJ: calls 20
swedox: folds
TutuB: calls 20
PokerGM2: folds
LONE STAR64: folds
ME: raises 100 to 120
footprint666: folds
MontyDJ: calls 100
TutuB: folds
*** FLOP *** [5s 4s Td]
ME: bets 200
MontyDJ: calls 200
*** TURN *** [5s 4s Td] 7♥
ME: bets 1240
MontyDJ: calls 1140 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [5s 4s Td 7h] 8♣
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ME: shows [Tc Ts] (three of a kind, Tens)
MontyDJ: shows [7s As] (a pair of Sevens)

sorry i didnt say my screen name just put me.

 

[stormswa]

 

[tigertight]

 

[tigertight]

just asking peaple how they would play it and if i played this to aggressive

 

[stormswa]

ME: bets 1240
MontyDJ: calls 1140 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [5s 4s Td 7h] 8♣
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ME: shows [Tc Ts] (three of a kind, Tens)
MontyDJ: shows [7s As] (a pair of Sevens)

sorry i didnt say my screen name just put me.

just asking peaple how they would play it and if i played this to aggressive

obviously not.

 

[tigertight]

so really there's nothing anyone can do except play extremely passive with the Cowboys, i personally love thme compared to bullets, anyday of the week,????

 

[stormswa]

so really there's nothing anyone can do except play extremely passive with the Cowboys, i personally love thme compared to bullets, anyday of the week,????

you do realize that is a quote in a signature and I didnt just type that right?

 

[OzExorcist]

Was gonna say, in this case it seems to have gotten the desired outcome...

Talking in general though? I think this depends on your image and having a read on your opponent more than anything else. If your image is genuinely that of a TAG player, and your opposition are paying attention (not always the case, especially at low levels), then maybe the pre-flop bet would've scared action away. I have no idea how the river bet didn't scare this opponent away either, BTW, but that's another story...

If you're seen as more of a LAG player though, the action might be about right. People are more likely to think you're just making a move with nothing and call you down

 

[tigertight]

thank you for your feedback.

 

[stormswa]

I have no idea how the river bet didn't scare this opponent away either, BTW, but that's another story...

If you're seen as more of a LAG player though, the action might be about right. People are more likely to think you're just making a move with nothing and call you down

no river action in this hand, was all in on turn. And at that point he had nut flush draw and pair so in villians eyes he had 9 outs to nut flush and 2 more sevens and 3 aces giving him 14 outs. Even if he discounts 2-3 he still had a good amount of outs.

 

[tigertight]

yup that he did thank you for your feedback

 

[tigertight]

still playing the sit and go still chip leader

 

[tigertight]

looking for more feed back.

 

[OzExorcist]

no river action in this hand, was all in on turn.

Ah - my bad, read it wrong

 

[ChuckTs]

You played it fine. The turn bet was a little big, but if you think your opponent has a hand strong enough to call a push with (that you beat, of course), then by all means do it.