loooooool (WCOOP final table hand)

  • Thread starter Dorkus Malorkus
  • Start date
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

I know playing for 10 hrs straight can do silly things to you but this is ridiculous. :p

pokerstars Game #2525393527: Tournament #10017950, Hold'em Pot Limit - Level XIX (8000/16000) - 2005/09/08 - 01:25:19 (ET)
Table '10017950 365' Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: SizDiz (124048 in chips)
Seat 2: BABYHAN (813245 in chips)
Seat 3: XX RAGED XX (464909 in chips)
Seat 4: wrap_99 (907984 in chips)
Seat 5: luckyfire4 (1134914 in chips)
Seat 6: dirkdiggler9 (2417400 in chips)
wrap_99: posts small blind 8000
luckyfire4: posts big blind 16000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
dirkdiggler9: folds
SizDiz: folds
BABYHAN: folds
XX RAGED XX: folds
wrap_99: raises 16000 to 32000
luckyfire4: raises 16000 to 48000
wrap_99: calls 16000
*** FLOP *** [2c 4s 3d]
wrap_99: checks
luckyfire4: bets 48000
wrap_99: calls 48000
*** TURN *** [2c 4s 3d] [4h]
wrap_99: checks
luckyfire4: bets 120000
wrap_99: calls 120000
*** RIVER *** [2c 4s 3d 4h] [3c]
wrap_99: checks
luckyfire4: bets 250000
wrap_99: calls 250000
*** SHOW DOWN ***
luckyfire4: shows [6d 7h] (two pair, Fours and Threes)
wrap_99: mucks hand
luckyfire4 collected 932000 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 932000 | Rake 0
Board [2c 4s 3d 4h 3c]
Seat 1: SizDiz folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: BABYHAN folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: XX RAGED XX (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: wrap_99 (small blind) mucked
Seat 5: luckyfire4 (big blind) showed [6d 7h] and won (932000) with two pair, Fours and Threes
Seat 6: dirkdiggler9 folded before Flop (didn't bet)


heey, you were watching me play?!

... jk =].

bro.... honostly... i've seen worse..

well wait.. no... if u had worse than a 6 kicker.. why woudl u call?
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

Only 2 hands the other guy could have had are 62 and 52, I think (I'm sleepy myself).

The best thing was the chat afterwards - turns out both guys thought they had straights. :D


Insane is right! Luckyfire4 has alot of balls to make that play IMO he's ricking nearly half his chips on a 7 high. Although, I did watch his table alot during the game and he was probably the best player.

I'm just amazed that guy called with a 6high or worse???

Does anyone know: Who is luckyfire4 I heard he was a pro from Las Vegas?


Ok, I can vaguely see, once in a blue moon, the slightest off chance that the raise wasnt that bad of a play..but who on EARTH would CALL that kind of raise with less than a 7 high? Am I wrong, or are there only 2 hands that he could have possibly had, those being a 2 6 and a 2 5 that would have lost and gotten mucked to a 7 high? What I would like to know is how someone can make it to that point in a tournament, and call with one of the two worst hands possible expecting to win. (Raising would be ok I guess, but CALLING that? WOW)

I'm speechless at the stupidity of Wrap_99

and to card_shark: That raise really wasnt that great. He was bluffing after the hand was checked to him. Any player can bluff hoping to take down a pot. And of course he was the best at the table, the other guy there is the worst player on earth!


Crippler: I never said the raise was a great play. I said he had alot of balls to make that play.Betting (250,000 on the river) If I was in his shoes I could not have bet that much on that hand!!! It turned out good for him though because that guy called with junk.

Thats all I was saying.
Starting Hands - Poker Hand Nicknames Rankings - Poker Hands