N
nicoiko
Visionary
Silver Level
Woosh it has been a while since i've posted here
So steel144 is TAG here and seems to be a good enough player (although saw him call a postflop bet for a good amount of the pot with 2nd pair on the flop but player he have to face with was very loose)
pokerstars Game #10028792914: Tournament #50840812, $36+$3 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/05/21 - 08:34:19 (ET)
Table '50840812 1' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Raider0907 (851 in chips)
Seat 2: steel144 (2080 in chips)
Seat 3: nikk23 (1455 in chips)
Seat 4: nicoiko (4614 in chips)
nicoiko: posts small blind 75
Raider0907: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to nicoiko [Qh Kc]
steel144: raises 450 to 600
nikk23: folds
nicoiko: calls 525
Raider0907: folds
*** FLOP *** [Td 8d Jc]
nicoiko: checks
steel144: bets 1480 and is all-in
nicoiko: ...
I think play is relatively obvious here but there is a SnG chips situation which could be interesting to discuss.
I also need your opinion as i recently change a bit my shorthanded table play and although it seems to work well i'm sometimes a bit lost about my play.
Let see if you have the same point of view as me
So steel144 is TAG here and seems to be a good enough player (although saw him call a postflop bet for a good amount of the pot with 2nd pair on the flop but player he have to face with was very loose)
pokerstars Game #10028792914: Tournament #50840812, $36+$3 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/05/21 - 08:34:19 (ET)
Table '50840812 1' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Raider0907 (851 in chips)
Seat 2: steel144 (2080 in chips)
Seat 3: nikk23 (1455 in chips)
Seat 4: nicoiko (4614 in chips)
nicoiko: posts small blind 75
Raider0907: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to nicoiko [Qh Kc]
steel144: raises 450 to 600
nikk23: folds
nicoiko: calls 525
Raider0907: folds
*** FLOP *** [Td 8d Jc]
nicoiko: checks
steel144: bets 1480 and is all-in
nicoiko: ...
I think play is relatively obvious here but there is a SnG chips situation which could be interesting to discuss.
I also need your opinion as i recently change a bit my shorthanded table play and although it seems to work well i'm sometimes a bit lost about my play.
Let see if you have the same point of view as me