Cardschat Freeroll 100$ Final Table Hand

[Gaviria8]

Hi guys, I want to know what you think about this calling situation, I want you tell my the correct range, no exactly hand just the range he should call to be correct, after I will say what he called.

I didn't put my hand to not influence your answer

 

[MemphisGrind]

Hi guys, I want to know what you think about this calling situation, I want you tell my the correct range, no exactly hand just the range he should call to be correct, after I will say what he called.

I didn't put my hand to not influence your answer


View attachment 228985

Snap shove says You can call 26.40% of hands by the big blind against an 11 bb shove from the button. It's an 11bb "shove" because the person calling is the effective stack. This range includes 22+, A2s+, A2o+ K8s+,K10o+, Q10s+, QJo+, and JTs

Villain should be shoving 35.70% from the button

 

[liuouhgkres]

Snap shove says You can call 26.40% of hands by the big blind against an 11 bb shove from the button. It's an 11bb "shove" because the person calling is the effective stack. This range includes 22+, A2s+, A2o+ K8s+,K10o+, Q10s+, QJo+, and JTs

Villain should be shoving 35.70% from the button

That's seems too loose to me. Does it consider icm too?

 

[brettlums]

i ran this through icmizer based on this play the button should be shoving 26% of his hands 88+, ATo+,ATs+. Probably only different than Memphis's reply because its top 2 stacks facing off

IMG: https://imgur.com/a/4GqesbR

 

[MemphisGrind]

i ran this through icmizer based on this play the button should be shoving 26% of his hands 88+, ATo+,ATs+. Probably only different than Memphis's reply because its top 2 stacks facing off

IMG: https://imgur.com/a/4GqesbR

Prolly. Snap shove doesn't recognize ICM. I just considers number of players, stack size and position. I did include a ten percent ante though.

 

[MemphisGrind]

That's seems too loose to me. Does it consider icm too?

No

 

[brettlums]

I haven't tried the snap shove program before maybe i'll play around with it tomorrow but i'm sure accounting for the 10% ante will widen the range a little.

 

[Andrew Popov]

For call: 22+ and Ax

 

[dedok0525]

At the final table with the size of his stack in relation to the others, and in a situation when the table 3 more opponents, and he's playing against one of them, the range Calling 22+, A2 +, K8s + K10os +, J10, Q9s +, Q10os +
Personally, I think that a pair of him 66+ or kq + A2+

 

[greatgame230]

The rank should be AK, AQ, JJ, KK, QQ this is the final table and you are the leader

 

[Yanko57]

At the final table with the size of his stack in relation to the others, and in a situation when the table 3 more opponents, and he's playing against one of them, the range Calling 22+, A2 +, K8s + K10os +, J10, Q9s +, Q10os +
Personally, I think that a pair of him 66+ or kq + A2+

I understand the reasoning of the first part here, but I hate so much calling with low pairs... So I think about the same as you.

 

[Gaviria8]

Ok, guys I will tell.

I did all in with AQs, and He called/All in with 77

 

[brettlums]

Yeah then his call was justified and he likely knew he was calling with a flip but thought 7's would hold.

 

[oreleo]

It's too wide range 22+, A2s+, A2o+ K8s+,K10o+, Q10s+, QJo+, and JTs. I'll never coll it here. Am I wrong ? And thos 2

 

[playinggameswithu]

I'd call with A9s or better.I like how we are still good if we lose the encounter