all-in situation

[Jyko3]

So, I had a situation here, to guys were all-in. One of them had JJ and other had QA, the first one got a jack on flop, and had 97% win, then second got Q on turn, and had 0%, why did he get 0, if he got another Q he would have won.

 

[Jyko3]

I got it, if he got another Q his enemy would have had a full-house

 

[CKALLDAY]

Another Queen would have given the player with JJ a full house which is superior to trip Queens.

JJJQQ > QQQAJ

There was no way the player could win, regardless of the river.

 

[blun777]

It would have been Full House for the Jacks but only trip for Queens

 

[ga25x]

I got it, if he got another Q his enemy would have had a full-house

Exactly!!!

 

[DaMooca]

For a post like this you can see why some players do what they do at the tables, they will play without even knowing the basics, which in this case would be at least the classification of hands.
You see, I'm just commenting on the fact that I think it's funny.
And there are people who play for money without knowing the basics of the game. In that case it was a 25 cents, but there are stories of people who went to play the wsop and took the hand classification on a piece of paper to be able to play.

 

[M13A13]

I always go all in when I have a good card in my hand, and I don't care if I lose or win, because if the opportunity is good then I have to take advantage.