PokerStars - 10/20 Ante 3 NL - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

Hero (MP+2): 1,434 (71.7 bb)
CO: 1,127 (56.4 bb)
BTN: 1,464 (73.2 bb)
SB: 57 (2.9 bb)
BB: 1,474 (73.7 bb)
UTG: 3,462 (173.1 bb)
UTG+1: 1,494 (74.7 bb)
MP: 1,494 (74.7 bb)
MP+1: 1,494 (74.7 bb)

9 players post ante of 3, SB posts 10, BB posts 20

Pre Flop: (pot: 57) Hero has
2 folds, MP calls 20, MP+1 raises to 60, Hero raises to 180, 5 folds, MP+1 calls 120

Flop: (437, 2 players)
MP+1 bets 220, Hero calls 220

Turn: (877, 2 players)
MP+1 checks, Hero checks

River: (877, 2 players)
MP+1 checks, Hero checks

Results: 877 pot (0 rake)
Final Board:

MP+1 shows : (Two Pair, Kings and Jacks)
(Pre 37%, Flop 77%, Turn 89%)

Hero mucks : (One Pair, Queens)
(Pre 63%, Flop 23%, Turn 11%)

MP+1 wins 877

I think 3bet is better (and you have position over MP+1), because if you only flat 60, you bring MP and maybe other players to see the flop, and holding AQ, it's not what you want

Hello, I agree with BullXT that 3bet is better than flat call pre flop. Pre flop I play bigger reraise at the beginning of the tournament on the very deep stacks. Pre flop I raise 4x60 and I add 1-3 big blinds for one limper, so I raise about 260-300. When I raise more pre flop sometimes limper fold medium hand. As played - when opponent bets on the flop for at least 50% of the pot and I don't have reads on him, I fold second pair, because usually opponent has top pair. So you played good check on the turn and on the river, but when limper check on the flop I continue aggression and I play cbet for at least 50%.

Originally Posted by jaworek1405

Hello, I agree with BullXT that 3bet is better than flat call pre flop. Pre flop I play bigger reraise at the beginning of the tournament on the very deep stacks. Pre flop I raise 4x60 and I add 1-3 big blinds for one limper, so I raise about 260-300. When I raise more pre flop sometimes limper fold medium hand. As played - when opponent bets on the flop for at least 50% of the pot and I don't have reads on him, I fold second pair, because usually opponent has top pair. So you played good check on the turn and on the river, but when limper check on the flop I continue aggression and I play cbet for at least 50%.

sorry guys, I made a small mistake in the end of my analysis. As I said, you play good check on the turn and on the river, but if the first raiser (not limper) check on the flop, I continue aggression and I play cbet for at least 50% of the pot.