I may have been wrong just on the turn but she still shouldn't have called
PokerStars, $0.98 + $0.12 - Hold'em No Limit - 30/60 (8 ante) - 9 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat

kroniculus (UTG): 11,964 (199 bb)
Sliding_Shiny (UTG+1): 5,000 (83 bb)
NoBADStodaY (MP): 4,978 (83 bb)
musalav77 (MP+1): 5,293 (88 bb)
BARSIK705 (LP): 4,885 (81 bb)
Ane1970 (CO): 3,879 (65 bb)
1Milhão$emNada (BU): 6,782 (113 bb)
badger/pit (SB): 4,450 (74 bb)
LERR08 (BB): 2,875 (48 bb)

Pre-Flop: (162) Hero (1Milhão$emNada) is BTN with Q♣ A♠
5 players fold, Ane1970 (CO) calls 60, 1Milhão$emNada (BU) raises to 342, 2 players fold, Ane1970 (CO) calls 282

Flop: (846) 3♦ 2♥ T♥ (2 players)
Ane1970 (CO) checks, 1Milhão$emNada (BU) bets 1,058, Ane1970 (CO) calls 1,058

Turn: (2,962) 7♠ (2 players)
Ane1970 (CO) checks, 1Milhão$emNada (BU) bets 3,703, Ane1970 (CO) calls 2,471 (all-in)

River: (7,904) 4♥ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: 7,904

Showdown:
1Milhão$emNada (BU) shows Q♣ A♠ (high card, Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 73%, Flop: 81%, Turn: 7%, River: 0%)

Ane1970 (CO) shows A♣ 7♥ (a pair of Sevens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 27%, Flop: 19%, Turn: 93%, River: 100%)

Ane1970 (CO) wins 7,904

Big bets. Have you done that in other hands with nothing and they have a read, what do you credit their flop call with?

The situation is very typical for freerolls and playing at low stakes, when someone can enter the game with almost any two cards and at the same time remain the winner. Yes, the villain was indescribably lucky, but you helped him a lot in this when you dispelled sweat. Pre-flop raise of almost six BB with off-hand AQ ?! And behind you are two blinds and a caller. I think that three explosives would be enough to find out your situation. After the flop, the board is relatively dry with slight hints of a straight or a flush draw. Overbet with an ace high card? Better a check or, in extreme cases, a bet lasting from 1/2 to 3/4 of a pot, with the goal of losing your hand if it takes a too sharp turn. After the turn, you yourself already understood the stupidity of the actions of both players. But the villain had at least a couple of 7 with a great kicker, and you have a clean bluff since by this moment the range of hands that you lose is too big. You should not abuse this tactic because at low limits there are a lot of answering machines that even with a small pair can call to the end. Good luck!

Don`t bluff fishes with nothing. I would check/fold without improvement.

Originally Posted by mara2259

The situation is very typical for freerolls and playing at low stakes, when someone can enter the game with almost any two cards and at the same time remain the winner. Yes, the villain was indescribably lucky, but you helped him a lot in this when you dispelled sweat. Pre-flop raise of almost six BB with off-hand AQ ?! And behind you are two blinds and a caller. I think that three explosives would be enough to find out your situation. After the flop, the board is relatively dry with slight hints of a straight or a flush draw. Overbet with an ace high card? Better a check or, in extreme cases, a bet lasting from 1/2 to 3/4 of a pot, with the goal of losing your hand if it takes a too sharp turn. After the turn, you yourself already understood the stupidity of the actions of both players. But the villain had at least a couple of 7 with a great kicker, and you have a clean bluff since by this moment the range of hands that you lose is too big. You should not abuse this tactic because at low limits there are a lot of answering machines that even with a small pair can call to the end. Good luck!

because this is what intrigues me, like that you pay 6 X pre flop and over pot on the flop with nothing with A7o ???