Fulltilt

[wicked663]

I like Full Tilt's tourneys but I wish they had micro stake sit n gos. Also would rather be able to upload my own avatar.

 

[gn2056]

I play there but honestly I dont like it. I like that the pros play there but I take way worse beats, and the tournesy are a nightmare. However, its one of the few sites I really trust to pay me out.

 

[gn2056]

I like Full tilt. they are one of the few sites that supports macs.

good point thats how I initially deposited there I was at my film students friends house and I couldnt get on bodog where all my money was so I dropped about six hundy on full tilt.

 

[bill461]

New to the site, but it has great looks and has good traffic. I would like to see an instant hand history that could be used for looking up databases.

Bill

 

[Tygran]

Geez...

Can we stop with all the "omg the bead beatzzzz lol11!!1!!" stories?

Name me a poker site this DOESN'T happen on...

bigger sites = more donks = more suck outs.

they also are more profitable if you know what you are doing



getting back on topic... I like FT although I primarily play at stars. I have a rakeback account at FT I haven't really taken much advantage of. The software and traffic are both awesome though.. personally i think Stars and FT are the bets 2 sites out there.

 

[KingCurtis]

I voted yes...because I do like it, but I like PS better

 

[NewHill]

So-So

I think Full Tilt is a good site and offers some great tourneys.I just think that alot of the players you have to deal with are slow and new to the game.

 

[chapeltuno]

The best part of FT IMO is the ability to watch the many famous pros go at it on the high stakes table. M Matusow is a riot talking in the live chat.

 

[dumpy620_84]

can anyone tell me what happened or what is going on with fulltilt's payout system? You can't cash out directly to the bank anymore and the check system is alittle shaky. Has anyone else had any problems?????

 

[Poof]

I like full tilt for the most part. I do not like the avatars so I play with those off.

 

[Syfted]

The graphics are outdated, much like most other poker sites. I use custom cards, chips, layouts, tables, etc... much more enjoyable that way. =)

 

[PDMike425]

i like both ps and ftp...but ftp more cause there is a lot of freerolls and really gives the ability to grow ya bank roll. with the fantasy poker, i made some decent money

 

[Lemlywinks]

My choice for Full Tilt is not up there.

But if 'Indifferent' was up there that's what I would have chosen. The interface on full tilt is second to none as well as lower limit game selection. However, i don't enjoy the avatars or the cartoonie backgrounds but that's just me.

 

[cAPSLOCK]

It's fine since it does what it is 'sposed to:

Deal cards, hand out chips.

What I DON'T like are the doofy avatars you are stuck with. I actually think avatar choice is a bit important for online play as crazy as that might sound.

I've only played the playmoney over there though. I might try to get a little account going eventually.

I like sites where "there are so many suckouts and bad beats"!

I kind of like them a lot.

cAPS

 

[Syfted]

I like Full Tilt Poker's diverse freerolls.

Major sites DON'T have the best freerolls. The best freerolls are on semi-established sites, with enough capital to advertise, but who need to build a playerbase. Unfortunately, the barring of American players from sites has caused an influx of players to FTP and PS, who really don't need to provide freerolls because their playerbase is so huge already.

Making $8 after a 6 hour tournament is kind of on the rough side. I can make $100 in those 6 hours waiting tables.

But... I'd rather play poker, so...

 

[donizhere]

Graphically speaking, Full Tilt is one of the best designed, so yeah i like FTP.

 

[TKinWIS]

I've only played at smaller rooms.
They're all acceptable, but the availability of games and people wanting to play at tilt is what sets it apart from the smaller rooms.

 

[danlang78]

I like fulltilt. Took a while to get use to because I use to play exclusively on pokerstars. But after seeing the commercials decided to give it a tr. I find thats it plays at a different pace than Pokerstars. More dokeys I think, but its still one the best sites im my opinion.

 

[GrantGreen]

I have a bunch of great table and card mods that I got from tiltbuster. And I have no avatars. So black felt and a dozen or so decks make for a cool site. Players are better than other sites though.

 

[BlackFish2]

Full tilt is my favorite poker site. I like the software, freerolls, avators and the background.

 

[brewdawg69]

Has anyone used the moneygram cashout option at fulltilt? I turned 50 into 500 last night yayayyayay and it's the quickest way to cash out for me.

 

[dweezel]

No cake .....???
No bastard >>>>>>??????

WTF

 

[Panamajoe]

NOPE, Don't like it. I can't believe no one else has trouble with the incredible LAAAAAAGING while there! I see the chips being pushed to the winner BEFORE you see the last cards.

I think they don't have enough bandwidth to screw with the goofy Avatars and still provide quick seemless play.

INO UB has been the best. Straight forward, easy to follow, no lagging.

I certainly understand that the lagging might be my problem but during chats many others find the same aggravating slowness.

EVERY single play the clock comes on EVEN WHEN I PRE-SELECT my choice. WTH?

I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, and I really enjoy the CC freerolls, but the questions was asked so....

PJ

 

[cardman87]

many people have already said it, but full tilt is the only site i know that i can play on my mac in the US... but i dont like it at all. partypoker was a lot better.

 

[t1tpfdc]

Voted yes, in the absence of a 'don't know' button.
Regged there not long ago and had some success (ITM in a CC event and won a freeroll), so yes, I guess
.
There's a lot I don't like about it, but then, I haven't checked out all the options!