ZOOM, RUSH, OTHER FAST CASH ????

[Artbart805]

Your "thinks" on this game play

I dont play it often but didnt care for it at first but now...???

 

[alien666dj]

According to my observations, when it comes to cash games, then there is not much difference between zoom and rush.

 

[fundiver199]

I have never had much success in this game format, and for that reason I moved on to other formats. Occationally I will come back to give it another try, but I usually end up regretting it after losing 5-6 buyins in almost no time

 

[padman400]

It is all I play these days Just get bored with tourneys and reg tables.

Break even player after about 35,000 hands hahaha

 

[Poker Orifice]

Your "thinks" on this game play

I dont play it often but didnt care for it at first but now...???

I think you'll get slaughtered on it but might do well on it at first (until all of the regulars have a few hands on you that is).

 

[4e kogo1]

Poker love!

for me, this is the perfect format of the cash game, dynamic and interesting ,do not want to play this hand, took it and dropped it, waiting for aces ))

 

[CDNMAN 42]

Zoom

Your "thinks" on this game play

I dont play it often but didnt care for it at first but now...???

Strange thing about Zoom, whenever I am getting really bad beats in tourneys, I'll try some low level Zoom and almost every time I do this I come up with a quick doubling or tripling of my start roll...however, when I just enter Zoom cold I usually lose quickly...Strange but true???

 

[PLOLmaha]

I play a bit of a mix, but going to switch to Rush & Cash from now on, given my limited time I can play, this also ensures I can get in some decent volume!

 

[TriszPoker]

Zoom or P.P. fastforward are way higher to beat then normal cash games if you play meaningful stakes( 10-25NL+++ ). Below that, you can win of course relatively easily a couple bb/100 playing boring and tight and not heroing river, but rake is so irrational that it eats away theoretical winnings and makes you break-even... So why bother... It is good for practice however, to see how well do you do after 10-20-30-50k hands and examine your samples and leaks, but thats it. Better to play more tables with slower format because there are way more fish. Or turn to shortdeck or Omaha, those are way more niche and softer if you learn some courses and have your ranges in order.

Edit: If you are breakeven or small winner at NL25-50, I can guarantee you, you would crush live 1-3/2-4/2-5 or whatever comparable stakes you have locally, and can be one of the weaker average regs in 5/10 and still have profits if you play with good table selection and avoid borderline spots against aggressive pro regs...

So I would either use fastforward for practice and then play online or offline ring games, or if playing fastforward I would be tempted to learn more Omaha. If someone insists on playing low/mid-stakes NLH Zoom and they want to make a profit or a 2nd income from it they will have to look for a pretty great rakeback deal... (hit me up!)

 

[telespf]

How often fast do you want do play a talbe, more fast you ll loser your money.

 

[Cooking]

I never had much success in the fast games. I don’t like them much because you can’t read your opponents since they are different in each hand, also you can’t bluff much because you usually are facing a premium hand.