Am I having a seizure reading this
or did you have a seizure in the midst of writing it
wait....im on drugs thats gotta be it
just kidding razarach
I seee you have theory and concepts in your thinking
but alot of your theorys need to be panned out with study
isolation is good
I like that tip@!
"Check= EV - 0
Because he will raise you if you check and you will fold if there's at least one over card on board."-razarach
check=EV 0
is just wrong , the only way it could be 0 is if when you check
and then you fold to any bet everytime
having some slowplay and decent check range is how we make EV off these players
#1
you bet
and he folds 80% of the time on the flop
#2 you checking portrays weakness
(and IS PURE weakness when you have no good holdings in your check range)
which induces a bet
he bets 65% of the time
half pot with any 2 cards
thats EV
Making that exact assumption about our opponents betting range is flawed.
If I check
and he bets in position with a 65% cbet
that doesn't guarantee a raise but a frequency
We can take his preflop range and run it against the odds of hitting the flop high card in flopzilla
back to the drawing board for you!!
Keep on thinking!!!
I applaud your effort in this post either way
I have written some stuff before and when I look at it the next day
I am ashamed lol
Hey m8,
I don't see why would anyone have seizure besides people that don't care about it. And why would I be on drugs and then you reply... does that mean you are on drugs too ?
About isolation.. that is pure my product . Everything else I red somewhere else but when I play and I see the opportunity, I say to myself:" let me isolate this guy 1:1, then we!re on a math field.... and its true.. bet size does matter !
Im kidding a little bit but sorry cause english is not my mother language. I have just wrote it as one of strategies from GTO which can vary up and down. I think I didn't miss the point since you understood and I'm glad that if I am wrong - Im not far away.
I agree that my theory needs to be panned out.. always.. every hand and again.
But you missed my first sentence... depending on position...
of course you wont value bet OOP with polarised board but mostly are condensed, right ?
And with that said and being in position... I think you have fair background for c-bet.
And we do t need flopzillla cause you never mention position.. I wrote that as action folds to me ! As from the post.
And it he bets 65% of the time with half raised pot.... my tens need to be ok for 35% of the time.. so its 1 outta 3...
and about check + 0 EV...
if Im in position and I opened the flop from button (obviously, im in position) with no over-cards .. guy checks - I bet...
cause if i check...I didn't earn anything... right ?
Now you will say he is slow-playing (I already mentioned but I'll clear this again). There will be sloplaying but only 15% of the time which makes bluffs and semiblufs up to 50% (give or take)
They thought me: poker is aggressive game and that is my approach but due to time, stakes, oponnent, pisition etc... I deviate up and down.
again, maybe I'm missing something