Pokerpoet2
Legend
Loyaler
My pet hate in Poker are those people who claim to be "The World's Best Poker Player".
Even Daniel Negreanu would not claim an assumption as this because in his own words "even the great players go on tilt occasionally".
I am happy if I make the final table occasionally let alone win, and if I do win I prefer to call it dumb luck rather than skill.
Phil Helmut, and Doyle Brunson both have had their bad beats but my question to you all is who do you consider to be worthy to be on a list for all time great poker players?
Even Daniel Negreanu would not claim an assumption as this because in his own words "even the great players go on tilt occasionally".
I am happy if I make the final table occasionally let alone win, and if I do win I prefer to call it dumb luck rather than skill.
Phil Helmut, and Doyle Brunson both have had their bad beats but my question to you all is who do you consider to be worthy to be on a list for all time great poker players?