No it will not. It takes a huge amount of lobbying for any sport to make it into the Olympic Games with some only admitted temporarily and others removed when losing popularity.
No serious person or body is going to lobby for poker to become an Olympic Sport.
New disciplines debuted at the youth Olympic Games Buenos Aires 2018:
Young people looking for sports, personal and social growth, debuted 8 disciplines: karate, sport climbing, break, speed skating on wheels, futsal, kiteboarding, beach handball and BMX Freestyle.
Poker today is increasingly dominated by young youth.
Why not ??
Yes, I also consider this factor one of the main against poker as a sports discipline.In my opinion it will never be, because in a sport the main factor is skill, which is achieved with a lot of discipline and repetition. What doesn't happen in poker ... there is no point in practicing studying, making the right move when the luck factor or "bad luck" has a very high weight on the player's performance. So I find it very hypocritical on the part of people who live on the basis of marketing, to be nurturing dreams, investing time and money in something that doesn’t depend exclusively on technique and performance. of the main characteristics of the "sport" mainly individual. except for some team sports ... but you never say Nadal was champion 3 times but was lucky, Or tennis player was champion against nadal but it was lucky ... Or Nadal was unlucky and got the vice championship. The answer will always be played badly and lost, it wasn't right ended up making mistakes ... So poker has an advantage over the sport, an amateur can become a champion exclusively by luck overnight. And definitely it doesn't happen in any "fair" sport, it is this factor that makes poker so unfair and frustrating.
And youre not whrong too, but every sport have this things. Do you already saw Itonya movie?? She try so hard for all seasons to be first even doing somethind that nobody else can do and yet she can. Every sport have his ups and downs. Every sport have the "lucky" or the variation, in his way.Not saying that I disagree with you, but we all remember Jesse James Silvia. That dude tried so very hard to bluff his whole stack off so many times. Time after time, he hit two and three outers to suck out when he got picked off. I'm just saying.
Youre not wrong to think that each one have different definitions, but chess.com and the dictionary are just opinios of a plataform and of a writer. IMSA are the organisation who control what is or not sport, they are not some people who think chess or poker is a sport. They are responsable for define the game wich have enough complexity to not be just a game but a game with so many tatics and strategy that have to count habilities first and not lucky.According IMSA, the International Mind Sport Association, both chess and poker are considered mind sports. I don't think that a sport and a mind sport are the same thing. They certainly have different definitions.
According to Chess.com, chess is not a sport. So I guess whether poker or chess are sports depend on who you ask. If you ask me, I say that, according the dictionary definition of sport, neither poker nor chess is a sport.
In my opinion it will never be, because in a sport the main factor is skill, which is achieved with a lot of discipline and repetition. What doesn't happen in poker ... there is no point in practicing studying, making the right move when the luck factor or "bad luck" has a very high weight on the player's performance. So I find it very hypocritical on the part of people who live on the basis of marketing, to be nurturing dreams, investing time and money in something that doesn’t depend exclusively on technique and performance. of the main characteristics of the "sport" mainly individual. except for some team sports ... but you never say Nadal was champion 3 times but was lucky, Or tennis player was champion against nadal but it was lucky ... Or Nadal was unlucky and got the vice championship. The answer will always be played badly and lost, it wasn't right ended up making mistakes ... So poker has an advantage over the sport, an amateur can become a champion exclusively by luck overnight. And definitely it doesn't happen in any "fair" sport, it is this factor that makes poker so unfair and frustrating.
Youre not wrong to think that each one have different definitions, but chess.com and the dictionary are just opinios of a plataform and of a writer. IMSA are the organisation who control what is or not sport, they are not some people who think chess or poker is a sport. They are responsable for define the game wich have enough complexity to not be just a game but a game with so many tatics and strategy that have to count habilities first and not lucky.
If it wasnt sport the name it woulb be IMGA, international mind games asociation or something.
Sports mid are sports. Just like motocross or another. Mind sports are all sports. Why they call sports if have no asociation with the real sport??