What is more difficult and interesting for you, Hold'em or Omaha?

RhinoRyan89

RhinoRyan89

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Total posts
1,400
Awards
2
GB
Chips
411
I would say Hold em is less interesting because it has been way more solved.

I also prefer Omaha and it can be more difficult because it has been less solved as a game. Also the variance is way higher in Omaha.

It's very rare for you to get the money in and be totally dead in Omaha unlike Hold em.
 
john_entony

john_entony

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Jun 3, 2023
Total posts
1,985
Awards
6
UA
Chips
189
If I was offered a choice between Hold'em and Omaha, I would still choose the main poker variant. Yes, Omaha is interesting (sometimes even profitable), but for me Texas Hold'em is more conventional and it's easier for me to compile statistics on players than I do in Omaha. :ninja:
 
R.Melnyk77

R.Melnyk77

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Jul 10, 2023
Total posts
612
Awards
1
UA
Chips
413
For me Omaha is a little more difficult, but more interesting than Holden.
I'm only interested in NL Hold'em. I don't play any other games because I try to improve my skills in one direction only, so I think my progress will be faster.
 
pirateglenn

pirateglenn

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Apr 17, 2018
Total posts
3,182
Awards
5
Chips
376
I have always been a die hard Texas no limit hold em guy until the last few years and i am finding that devoting a bit of time to watching Omaha hi/lo pros play their game has really helped me - i enjoy the challenge of hi/lo more and it definitely gets me thinking more about my hands and the variants involved - as others have said - you are never totally dead in Omaha which for me, makes it more interesting.
Its also noticeable that fewer hands are folded at the start of a Omaha game.
 
H

havingfun

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 1, 2023
Total posts
63
ZA
Chips
136
I think Omaha is a lot of fun, and crazy hands happen, but I also feel that for the most part there is a lot more luck involved with Omaha compared to Hold'em.
Don't get me wrong, Hold'em also has lots of elements of luck involved, but I feel that the skill level that a person brings to the table with Hold'em is more valuable to the game compared to Omaha.
 
lyki67

lyki67

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
May 28, 2021
Total posts
834
Awards
2
BA
Chips
406
Interesting are both, but I think Omaha is some more difficult to play because there are more possibilities to get good hand (or to loose with good cards).
 
pentazepam

pentazepam

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Total posts
2,588
Awards
4
SE
Chips
1,027
I have written before that I like to play a lot of different variations of Poker so I don't get bored.

If you include all the variants of Omaha (like Hi-Low) that is more interesting and fun than Holdem.

But if I only had to choose between NLH and PLO the choice would be hard because the variance in PLO almost drove me insane when I tried to only play that for a while.

Just playing one variant always gets boring after a while no matter what type of poker it is.

Omaha is a little more difficult since you have to count more outs, combinations, etc - but at the lower levels, it often has less bluffing.

So what is more fun often depends on the players at the table. And not only the poker variant.
 
dreamer13

dreamer13

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Total posts
3,681
Awards
2
LV
Chips
818
Texas Hold'em and Omaha are relatively young types of poker, appearing just over ten years apart.It is noted that the game of Omaha is more mechanical in nature, since you have to participate in the hand with any contact with the flop.Hold'em gives more creative freedom and requires intelligence. In addition, NLHE remains the most popular discipline, and the chance to encounter opponents who have an idea of strategy is higher here even at tables with amateurs.It is also noted that in Hold'em you can build a basic strategy much faster, while in PLO even after tens of thousands of hands a beginner still does not understand what is happening at the tables. In NLHE we know that AK is a good hand, and losing with aces against kings is just a bad beat. In Omaha everything is much more shaky and uncertain, any mistakes are heavily disguised, which prevents understanding the correct strategy.
 
Rachidao

Rachidao

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Total posts
682
Awards
1
BR
Chips
425
I like them both, Omaha is more difficult and have a higher variance.
 
M

martDdart

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Total posts
455
Awards
1
NO
Chips
535
I prefer holdem,reason: I know how to play it,I tried Omaha once when I by accident registred to a table,I did not understand completly how it worked.Next time I try Omaha, I will first learn how to play.
 
C

Cooking

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 19, 2011
Total posts
2,905
Awards
2
Chips
526
Omaha is more interesting because there's a lot more action, but also there are more luck involved. I think at first Omaha can be more difficult to learn, but I think NLH is more difficult to dominate.
 
thetick33

thetick33

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Total posts
2,565
Awards
6
US
Chips
729
rather play omaha in cash can rise fast....in tourneys like omaha high low or no limit holdem the same ...for cash prefer pl omaha str8 can really get a nice bank in a hurry imho
 
mdnmdn

mdnmdn

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Total posts
342
Awards
1
US
Chips
107
I use to play in a weekly NL game but it was changed to omaha because everyone wanted more action. It worked!! omaha is a drawing game compared to nl. I like them both.
 
eetenor

eetenor

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Total posts
2,382
Awards
2
Chips
393
Omaha is more interesting and fun to play as your Villains cannot just shove preflop or flop to end the hand quickly so more strategy on later streets is more interesting to me:unsure::geek:
 
N

NotADonk

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Total posts
664
Awards
1
Chips
333
For me Omaha is a little more difficult, but more interesting than Holden.
I know how to play both. The pot limit feature in PLO is good as it stops maniacs from just shoving all the time pre flop.
I have never seen pot limit holdem anywhere but I think that would be an interesting variant.
 
S

skaterick

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Total posts
2,006
Awards
10
US
Chips
277
you want difficult .... try pot limit omaha high low ! great game , very challenging and mathematical ,and of course incredibly frustrating !
 
8

888NOX888

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Total posts
651
Awards
2
Chips
388
It's harder for me to play Omaha, but Texas Hold'em is more interesting to play.
 
Top