I think luck is more present in omaha, I think 70% of the time.
Texas holden is much more strategic and needs a higher dose of skill.
Here comes another question: Is it easier to win with luck? Or is it easier to win with skill?
I think it's harder to master the Texas Holden.
I find Texas Hold em harder. Not sure why. But I think you hsvr to be better at bluffing with air
In Omaha the nuts are so more common that it’s easier to pick off bluffers
I think Omaha fits more of a good caller vs an artful bluffer
Sometimes it,s hard to keep patience for me, especially, when you keep loosing with best hands time after time. You just understand that you made the correct moves but you still can,t get the profit you deserve. So, that,s really dissapointing.
I have spent the last few months playing the two modalities and it has gone mla in Holdem and that is what I play the most, in Omaha I have achieved better results I imagine it is because in Omaha you have a much wider range than in Holdem and I can invent to play more loose than in holdem
i like omaha but stopped to play it because i was almost every time loosing on the river, if i am chasing the straight or full it just simply never comes and if i am playing against someone who is chasing it always comes, i'll just stay away.
Undoubtedly, no-limit Omaha no-limit hold'em is much more complicated, but with regard to Pot-limit Omaha, here it is not clear that more difficult. The difficulty of a good combination is another reason why hold'em remains the number one in the poker world. The truth is that it is easy to learn to play poker, but in order to learn how to play well, you will need a whole life. Learn the rules and seniority of combinations in hold'em is very simple. Learning the same for Omaha will be harder. For some it is bad, for others it is good. A lot of players like additional difficulties. And it prevents others to fully enjoy the game.
i like playing both online and neither present any difficulties, but i do have to pay more attention when playing omaha. however, live is very different for me. nlhe live is a different animal than playing online; however omaha was just way too different from me and i don't think i'll ever play omaha live again. it was just more difficult because i'm so used to playing omaha online
Some people feel that Omaha is a simpler game in terms of math, because it’s easier to make good hands with four hole cards instead of two. Straight flushes and sets are far more common in this game than in Texas holdem. The latter is more wide-open due to only having two hole cards. Unlike Omaha, you can win more hands in Texas holdem with high pairs and two pairs. But Omaha is a game that sees bigger winning hands. You oftentimes must hold the nuts to win pots on a full-ring table.
Good evening everyone.
When I started playing the game, I am not required to use 2 of the 4 cards you receive, along with 3 of the 5 cards on the table.
In my opinion, which is more difficult, and best for those with more technical knowledge and for those who have a good postflop reading.