This is a discussion on what kind of figure do you consider yourself to be? within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; If you compare poker with playing chess, then what kind of figure do you consider yourself to be?
For example, I consider myself a pawn!
Congratulations on posing a fun and insightful question for us to answer! I know that I am not a pawn because I can vary my movements depending upon the situation. Maybe the queen? I don't think so because I'm not usually, if ever, the most powerful player on the board. Maybe the king because you must beat me in order for you to win? Probably not because the king is a pretty passive piece and I am an aggressive player, so that leaves the bishop, knight, and rook (castle). I'm not flashy like the knight who makes fancy hook shots to defeat it's opponent. The bishop can cover the board diagonally, while the rook covers it in straight line either forward or sideways. So which of those am I? Do I attack my opponents head on like the rook, or do I flank them like the bishop? I am definitely the rook.
The hardest thing about being a trans-woman is trying to learn
how to not enjoy The Three Stooges. I've failed miserably. LOL!!
Everyone should take into account that a pawn is the only piece this, reaching the end, can become equal to the queen, hence the conclusion that this is not a weak piece - the main thing is to be able to use it!