
heatfan03
Visionary
Ok So while I was railing some fellow CC members I started looking at the tournaments and such on Full Tilt. The SitNgo's are for the most part the same. 27 mans have one more paid spot than pokerstars do.
The Cash Games obviously are the same.
Tournaments though. through the first 90 mins the blinds get to the same level and from then on they still go pretty similar to eachother. (although 15 min bigger intervals vs 10 min smaller intervals). The main difference though is the amount of players on Fulltilt. The tourneys from 2 to 10 bucks have between 300 and 600 people whereas on POkerstars they are from 1400 to 3000 people in these. So My question comes to Which Tournament would be better for a player who likes longer matches. Is the People Count irrelevant or no? I thought it would be since you have less players = less chips.
another question that would help evaluate this is if everyone could finish this sentence "I play tournaments at FT over PS (or vice versa) Because......"
I am thinking about transferring my 250 into FT instead now.
all comments appreciated.
The Cash Games obviously are the same.
Tournaments though. through the first 90 mins the blinds get to the same level and from then on they still go pretty similar to eachother. (although 15 min bigger intervals vs 10 min smaller intervals). The main difference though is the amount of players on Fulltilt. The tourneys from 2 to 10 bucks have between 300 and 600 people whereas on POkerstars they are from 1400 to 3000 people in these. So My question comes to Which Tournament would be better for a player who likes longer matches. Is the People Count irrelevant or no? I thought it would be since you have less players = less chips.
another question that would help evaluate this is if everyone could finish this sentence "I play tournaments at FT over PS (or vice versa) Because......"
I am thinking about transferring my 250 into FT instead now.
all comments appreciated.
Last edited: