surely anything you can win and lose money on is classed as gambling, i agree that poker is a game of skill but the fact money is involved would class it as gambling in my eyes
I consider poker gambling using a literal definition. The mere fact that some players are able to attain a positive expectation does not mean they're not gambling. In that sense, even casinos are "gambling" against the players.
To give an example: Imagine a billionaire offered to give you AA against his any two cards, and would go all in heads up pre-flop. The only condition: you have to wager your entire house, car, assets, net worth, etc. and you cannot purchase insurance. Would you take this bet?
I think poker can satisfy a lot of kind of people, that one wants to win by knowledge, that one wants to win by luck without knowledge, the pros and that in evolution to be a pro. I think poker may be a gambling or not, it depends on players point of view. What is your opinion about it?
It is not enough to have knowledge, you need to play bankroll, and the game against the same good player will be negative, since you both pay rake feesI think poker can satisfy a lot of kind of people, that one wants to win by knowledge, that one wants to win by luck without knowledge, the pros and that in evolution to be a pro. I think poker may be a gambling or not, it depends on players point of view. What is your opinion about it?