B
bananovsky1999
Rock Star
J
JTaichou
Rising Star
surfer696
Rock Star
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into poker gameplay has had a significant impact on the game, offering new possibilities for players and raising important ethical questions. While some worry that the use of AI-powered software could give certain players an unfair advantage, others see it as a valuable asset to the poker industry, making the game more accessible to new players and improving overall gameplay.
What do you think about the impact of AI on the game of poker
What do you think about the impact of AI on the game of poker
M
MakTrue
Visionary
Good afternoon!
I'm all for "pure" poker without the use of any additional software that can affect the gameplay.
It's one thing to learn outside of the game, it's another to use the software while playing.
Of course, it is difficult to compete with those who use it, as this gives certain advantages to the players. Therefore, I prefer to play where any software that affects the gameplay is prohibited.
I'm all for "pure" poker without the use of any additional software that can affect the gameplay.
It's one thing to learn outside of the game, it's another to use the software while playing.
Of course, it is difficult to compete with those who use it, as this gives certain advantages to the players. Therefore, I prefer to play where any software that affects the gameplay is prohibited.
Stringy
Visionary
same think it will be bad for poker
rhoudini
Enthusiast
Hey surfer696, how are you doing?
Well, I work with I.T. and I am a bit familiar with A.I., so let me try to add some key concepts to have in mind.
First, the tradicional approach of computer analysis for any game was brute force: computers are far more powerful than humans in brute force calculation. However, this can be quite expensive, both in terms of resources and time. The human mind, in other hand, is quite powerful in directing attention to most important subjects. Humans evaluate new aspects by previous experience, something that a computer does not do using brute force. While this was a great advance, at some point the results will be limited.
The premise of an AI is try to achieve the best of both worlds, trying to make a machine "learn" new concepts by somehow training it to use previous results, trying to simulate human mind and intelligence. This can increase our comprehension in so many subjects, because now we don't need to many hours of processing to evaluate complex things. But this "AI revolution" is quite similar to the computer revolution many years ago.
Why am I pointing all that stuff? In the same way that computers changed our comprehension of poker, AIs will probably have a huge impact in game theory. But, the same way computers did not kill the game, AIs will not kill the game too: we have to learn how to use it to benefit us in terms of learning and training and better understanding the game. Maybe 90% of the game will still be the same; concepts like position, psychology and many others will always be fundamental.
Of course, this will also raise security and ethics issues, but it is part of the process. I encourage everyone to embrace and use these tools to improve.
Well, I work with I.T. and I am a bit familiar with A.I., so let me try to add some key concepts to have in mind.
First, the tradicional approach of computer analysis for any game was brute force: computers are far more powerful than humans in brute force calculation. However, this can be quite expensive, both in terms of resources and time. The human mind, in other hand, is quite powerful in directing attention to most important subjects. Humans evaluate new aspects by previous experience, something that a computer does not do using brute force. While this was a great advance, at some point the results will be limited.
The premise of an AI is try to achieve the best of both worlds, trying to make a machine "learn" new concepts by somehow training it to use previous results, trying to simulate human mind and intelligence. This can increase our comprehension in so many subjects, because now we don't need to many hours of processing to evaluate complex things. But this "AI revolution" is quite similar to the computer revolution many years ago.
Why am I pointing all that stuff? In the same way that computers changed our comprehension of poker, AIs will probably have a huge impact in game theory. But, the same way computers did not kill the game, AIs will not kill the game too: we have to learn how to use it to benefit us in terms of learning and training and better understanding the game. Maybe 90% of the game will still be the same; concepts like position, psychology and many others will always be fundamental.
Of course, this will also raise security and ethics issues, but it is part of the process. I encourage everyone to embrace and use these tools to improve.
idhemmy
Rock Star
I haven't had a positive experience using ChatGPT for poker. I found that the responses were often too general or not relevant to my specific questions. I prefer to rely on other resources for poker-related information and strategies , maybe gpt 4 will be more specific and accurate 
Last edited:
Igor G
Visionary
For me, the impact of artificial intelligence on my bankroll is more important
So far, it is growing, so overall I am positive about the situation and continue to work towards my goals.
Tracid
Bought a 12yr old scotch (parents not happy)
Community Guide
Have seen a few people making threads about, and replies with, ChatGPT excerpts - often Andyreas…