From the first poker game till now, poker has been evolving constantly. Do you have an outstanding idea for a new poker variety? What is it called, and what are the rules ? Did you try it with friends, and what did they think about it?
If a complete new game is to far fetched for you idea, is there anything you would change in the game you play mostly at the moment?

There was a thread some time ago about new poker variance with 2 cards flop two cards turn and one card river. Or was it 2 1 2. Dont remember. But it would be certainly fun to try some time.

Originally Posted by abgvedr

There was a thread some time ago about new poker variance with 2 cards flop two cards turn and one card river. Or was it 2 1 2. Dont remember. But it would be certainly fun to try some time.

With a live tournament with friends it could be worth a try.

in online poker, I would ban programs that read the opponent.Learn to see the situation in the game not by numbers but by understanding the outcome of the event at the table.

Hi.
I would not like to change anything. I have accounts on 5 different sites, and the range of tournaments available to me is more than enough. All the rules suit me perfectly and I don't see the point in changing anything.
Good luck.

I'm NLHE enthusiast, besides LHE, it is the only game played for money. Keep it the same, as it has been since early 1900's.

Originally Posted by Newzooozooo

Hi.
I would not like to change anything. I have accounts on 5 different sites, and the range of tournaments available to me is more than enough. All the rules suit me perfectly and I don't see the point in changing anything.
Good luck.

Hi Newzooozooo, what is the game you play the most?

Originally Posted by MrPokerVerse

I'm NLHE enthusiast, besides LHE, it is the only game played for money. Keep it the same, as it has been since early 1900's.

Hey MrPokerVerse
Its my favourite too and the only real money game for me also.

Originally Posted by sharipov8090

in online poker, I would ban programs that read the opponent.Learn to see the situation in the game not by numbers but by understanding the outcome of the event at the table.

Hi Sharipov, that would be a big pro for me too!

Originally Posted by tomatientje

With a live tournament with friends it could be worth a try.

Well there is already a poker variance called reverse Hold'em, with 1 1 3. But as for me its not enough action. So this variance i said is kind of in between. So who knows maybe its future top variance

i dont know if it already exists but a poker variant that mixes both poker stud and holdem could be great. for example every player gets dealt 3 cards preflop ( 2 cards face down and 1 card face up), then the game is played exactly like holdem with a player on the button and then the small blind and big blind ( not like stud in which the lowest card player is forced to make a bet).. then the flop is dealt with only 2 community cards instead of 3... then the turn (1 card), and the river (1 card), and the player with the best hand using 2 or the 3 cards of their own in combination with the board cards wins the hand..... ( you cant just use 1 of your 3 cards just like omaha with the exception that you can use all your 3 cards to make the best hand)

Fruit salad: like crazy pineapple but you get 4 cards instead of 3. You give up one card on the flop and one card on the turn. Then it plays like holdem.

Omaha 321: 3 flops are dealt in a 3x3 array. 2 turns are dealt in a 2x2 array. One river card is dealt. You have to pick one of the 3 flops, one of the two turns and the river and make your best hand according to the regular Omaha 3 community plus 2 hole card rules.

Everything suits me in the rules of the game. I wouldn't change anything.

3 card badugi: you get 3 cards and you can draw your cards max 3 times.

the board will show 3 cards and you need to use one of them making a hand

so A234 rainbow would be the nuts like regular badugi

Originally Posted by Newzooozooo

Hi.
I would not like to change anything. I have accounts on 5 different sites, and the range of tournaments available to me is more than enough. All the rules suit me perfectly and I don't see the point in changing anything.
Good luck.

All the changes to now is more than i can understand

I have omaha once briefly and liked it, but I was worried it might put me off my usual hold em game. Will deffo put same time into it further down the line.

Definitely I rather keep playing the game oldskool.

I would not like to change anything in reality the game of Texas holdem without limits is perfect for me and the only ones who must change and evolve in the game are the players.

Everything suits me, especially on the PS)

i've been playing with friends on new poker variants, made up versions where you still bet on 2 cards + flop/turn/river, but you have to choose from multiple sets.
It gets more detailed where the host gets the last pick, but they can choose anything that is not chosen

I wonder if any poker room would allow to try some poker variance there!
I mean its certainly should not be too much of trouble. If we come up here with some really cool ideas i think they might.

I see new games from some poker rooms , especially PS , don't have that success , players stuck to the old well known and played games like NLH . I don't like changes to rules either , the games are fine the way they already are

Originally Posted by rock0001

i dont know if it already exists but a poker variant that mixes both poker stud and holdem could be great. for example every player gets dealt 3 cards preflop ( 2 cards face down and 1 card face up), then the game is played exactly like holdem with a player on the button and then the small blind and big blind ( not like stud in which the lowest card player is forced to make a bet).. then the flop is dealt with only 2 community cards instead of 3... then the turn (1 card), and the river (1 card), and the player with the best hand using 2 or the 3 cards of their own in combination with the board cards wins the hand..... ( you cant just use 1 of your 3 cards just like omaha with the exception that you can use all your 3 cards to make the best hand)

Do you have a name for this game, which souds very interesting by the way.

Originally Posted by abgvedr

I wonder if any poker room would allow to try some poker variance there!
I mean its certainly should not be too much of trouble. If we come up here with some really cool ideas i think they might.

That would be really nice, I'll send a link to this thread to PS and 888. Who knows ...

Originally Posted by blackknives

i've been playing with friends on new poker variants, made up versions where you still bet on 2 cards + flop/turn/river, but you have to choose from multiple sets.
It gets more detailed where the host gets the last pick, but they can choose anything that is not chosen

What do you mean with multiple sets, I ask because "set" has its meaning in poker.

The truth is, I have never tried any variant of Texas holdem poker ... but I would be open to trying something that improves the game and makes it more interesting, for example ... sometimes we find ourselves in situations where we form two fullhouses at the same time ... but the opponent forms a fullhouse and the pot ends in equal parts ... it seems unfair ...

player 01 ... has 98s in hand
player 02 ... has 97s in hand

flop is: 988- Turn: 9 River: 5

In this situation the two players would have the same full-hose 99988

Originally Posted by slicheri93

3 card badugi: you get 3 cards and you can draw your cards max 3 times.

the board will show 3 cards and you need to use one of them making a hand

so A234 rainbow would be the nuts like regular badugi

So a good hand is probably an instant winner and bluffing will be very common in the game.

Originally Posted by perrypip

Fruit salad: like crazy pineapple but you get 4 cards instead of 3. You give up one card on the flop and one card on the turn. Then it plays like holdem.

Omaha 321: 3 flops are dealt in a 3x3 array. 2 turns are dealt in a 2x2 array. One river card is dealt. You have to pick one of the 3 flops, one of the two turns and the river and make your best hand according to the regular Omaha 3 community plus 2 hole card rules.

All new to me!

Pot limit NLH with 5 community cards dealt individualy which account to 5 streets

Originally Posted by peaceofcoke

Pot limit NLH with 5 community cards dealt individualy which account to 5 streets

A simple adaption, but it can give/cost you a lot of money I'd think.

Originally Posted by tomatientje

That would be really nice, I'll send a link to this thread to PS and 888. Who knows ...

This afternoon I sent the link to this thread to PS and 888, I'll update the thread if anything happens from there side.

Poker, when you not only do not see the cards of your opponents, but also your) XD

Originally Posted by technotehnoman

Poker, when you not only do not see the cards of your opponents, but also your) XD

Good one)
I think it could be a fun variance if you can see only cards of your opponents but not yours)

Here is a good one to try: https://upswingpoker.com/moss-poker/

This is just a variant of Holdem, but it looks like it could be fun in a home game setting.

Good luck and God bless

Originally Posted by NWPatriot

Here is a good one to try: https://upswingpoker.com/moss-poker/

This is just a variant of Holdem, but it looks like it could be fun in a home game setting.

Good luck and God bless

Omg so complicated

Originally Posted by tomatientje

A simple adaption, but it can give/cost you a lot of money I'd think.

Hence the pot limit

Originally Posted by abgvedr

Omg so complicated

I suppose, but it could be simplified quite a bit - I wouldn't use points but merely 4 differnet bet sizes and be done with it. I am always looking for something that makes it interesting when there only a few of us. Straight holdem can get very boring when everyone is folding 75% of the time. This gives everyone a few hands to decide how they want to play them. Give it a try, you might like it.

Good luck.

Originally Posted by tomatientje

What do you mean with multiple sets, I ask because "set" has its meaning in poker.

i should have set pairs of cards,
let me run an example:

Row 1: [] [] [] [] <- start here
Row 2: [] [] [] []
Row 3: [] [] [] []

Each one of those [] is a pair of cards (randomly dealt, and only 1 pair at a time),
As the host, row 1, i deal the first 2, and player(s) decide to bet or not on this, we just did a single chip.
If they skipped, i deal the second pair, etc...
They cannot skip the last one (row 1, column 4).
So assuming the player picked one of the 4 options, as the host, i will get to pick any of the three left (as my host advantage)

anyways it was something i created as a variation, i don't know about the odds, i still tinker with it at times after 3 hours of poker at live gatherings and as if they want to play something else like this.

Originally Posted by blackknives

i should have set pairs of cards,
let me run an example:

Row 1: [] [] [] [] <- start here
Row 2: [] [] [] []
Row 3: [] [] [] []

Each one of those [] is a pair of cards (randomly dealt, and only 1 pair at a time),
As the host, row 1, i deal the first 2, and player(s) decide to bet or not on this, we just did a single chip.
If they skipped, i deal the second pair, etc...
They cannot skip the last one (row 1, column 4).
So assuming the player picked one of the 4 options, as the host, i will get to pick any of the three left (as my host advantage)

anyways it was something i created as a variation, i don't know about the odds, i still tinker with it at times after 3 hours of poker at live gatherings and as if they want to play something else like this.

Forgot to mention, once all three rows have been chosen, i deal out the flop, turn, river and payout winners per row. Also tinkered with longer rows etc, other rules

Originally Posted by sharipov8090

in online poker, I would ban programs that read the opponent.Learn to see the situation in the game not by numbers but by understanding the outcome of the event at the table.

I fully agree with you! It would be cool))))

Originally Posted by sharipov8090

in online poker, I would ban programs that read the opponent.Learn to see the situation in the game not by numbers but by understanding the outcome of the event at the table.

But many players play at several tables at the same time.
It is very difficult to monitor how each player is behaving, whether playing tight or loose, at each of the tables.
The programs are an aid to those who play multiple tables.

Programs do not give a 100 percent result in the game and even interfere somewhere and you can make a lot of mistakes.

Originally Posted by sharipov8090

Programs do not give a 100 percent result in the game and even interfere somewhere and you can make a lot of mistakes.

But rarely will we be 100% sure playing poker. Several times we call several bets without being sure that we have the best hand.
For some recreational players who play only one or two tables at the same time, for example, ok I think an auxiliary program is not necessary, but for those who play several tables and spend several hours playing, it is even necessary to use a hud.

Originally Posted by tomatientje

Hi Newzooozooo, what is the game you play the most?

Hi.
What I like most are our daily and weekly freerolls.

Originally Posted by Lexand

But rarely will we be 100% sure playing poker. Several times we call several bets without being sure that we have the best hand.
For some recreational players who play only one or two tables at the same time, for example, ok I think an auxiliary program is not necessary, but for those who play several tables and spend several hours playing, it is even necessary to use a hud.

Each player has their own truth.And it is not appropriate to argue here.If a person plays for example 20 tables at once, then this will probably help him.I think all the same programs do not allow our minds to develop so I am an opponent of programs.

Originally Posted by Newzooozooo

Hi.
What I like most are our daily and weekly freerolls.

haha, I understand, for me its the weekly ones for now.

Originally Posted by technotehnoman

Poker, when you not only do not see the cards of your opponents, but also your) XD

it would give a strange effect I think, maybe do some secret raises too, so if your opponent calls and suppose he looses, then you show what she has to pay. Not to many players I'm affraid.

Originally Posted by tomatientje

Do you have a name for this game, which souds very interesting by the way.

sorry for the late reply., i dont have a name for this poker style however it could be named nl stud hold em or nl hold em stud.

Originally Posted by tomatientje

This afternoon I sent the link to this thread to PS and 888, I'll update the thread if anything happens from there side.

PS has answered the folowing, it probably looks like a standard answer, but they sent the link to the ideation team anyway.


Their reply:
-
Thank you for your comments.
We have forwarded your suggestion to our Ideation Team, who is best placed to address your comments and identify if this is something that we could implement at this time.
Rest assured that all feedback is very important to us and we consider all suggestions that are sent our way; we will inform you accordingly should it be decided that your suggestion is considered feasible.
Let us know if you have any other ideas or suggestions.
Regards,

Joao
Stars Support
-

My ides is to play Texas hold ‘em as per usual but with a twist at the end. Have you ever wished you had played your junk hand like 92o because you would have made a full house and three players had gone all in at the river with the winning hand being a flush? Well, my idea is that any hand that goes to showdown, 5-10% of the total pot would go to whoever would have made the best hand had they played. To qualify you would have to be not sitting out and would have to show your hole cards after. That would prevent people who sit out from winning and let’s say you didn’t want to show your cards because someone bluffed you off the best hand, then you wouldn’t need to show but you wouldn’t win the cut. I think it would keep people more engaged at the table and be a bit of fun showing your 92o boat. This would be for MTTs except for the final table. Kind of like how you can show your cards after the hand on gg poker.