Common Answers to Online Poker Being Rigged

R

rmillot

Rising Star
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Total posts
3
Hello.

This thread is not an opinion of whether or not online poker is rigged. It is an attempt to show that the two most common (and annoying) responses to a whiny player who claims that online poker is rigged are completely absurd.


1. "Online poker sites make millions and millions of dollars. Why would they risk it all by rigging the game?"

Let me answer this question with another question...Why would Martha Stewart, who owns a $600 million dollar product line, risk losing a large part of her fortune and imprisonment by engaging in insider trading?

online poker sites are already taking a risk by taking bets illegally from U.S. players after the passing of the UIGEA. Is it really such a far stretch to imagine them placing bots or insiders in the ring games? I'm not implying that all of them (or any of them, for that matter) do...I'm just trying to stamp out the fallacy that just because someone SHOULDN'T do something automatically means that they won't. Greed is extremely powerful...why make $500 million a year from blinds when you can make $1 billion from the players? If the CEOSs are not afraid of "risking" fines and possible imprisonment for taking bets from US players, why should they be afraid of "risking" cheating?

2. "You encounter a lot more bad beats online than you do in live games because you see many more hands per hour."

This is true: however, what players usually mean when they complain about too many bad beats online is that they experience a larger PERCENTAGE of bad beats online than they do in live games. If, on average, a winning player plays 8 all-ins in a live game and has 1 bad beat, he can expect to play 32 all-ins in an online game and experience 4 bad beats. In the end, this player will be a winner, and will probably not complain about the number of bad beats he experienced because he is still ahead. What is more probable is that the player complaining did not truly experience a bad beat (perhaps he miscounted his opponents outs), or that he is experiencing a discrepancy in the ratio of wins to outdraws in shifting from the live to the online game that is causing him to lose.

R
 
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

HELLO INTERNET
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Total posts
12,422
B0000073PP.02._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
 
KingNothing4

KingNothing4

Rock Star
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Total posts
382
ya i used to be 1 that said online poker can seem extreme compared to live play, but i just played a home game and i have never seen som1 get so lucky, online or live, as this 1 guy who doesnt even really know how to play poker...he hit every all-in he made except obviously his last 1...which was literally 8 times out of 9...it was gross he hit 3 rivers on me to knock me out...i thought wow this is like rigged online poker haha j/k and there is no exhaggeration (idk how to spell that word haha) to this story either, it just made me sick and the other players like wtf is wrong with these cards.
 
reglardave

reglardave

Legend
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Total posts
2,264
We're sorry, the number you are trying to reach is not in service at this time............
 
smd173

smd173

Cardschat Elite
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Total posts
1,520
Online poker sites are already taking a risk by taking bets illegally from U.S. players after the passing of the UIGEA.

That's incorrect. The UIGEA is strictly about the rules governing FINANCIAL institutions in relation to payouts to gambling related sites. The UIGEA never made making or taking wagers illegal offshore, because the US does not have jurisdiction to make those laws.

The reason pokerstars and Full Tilt continued to accepted US players money over party poker was because they are not publicly traded companies. So they have no shareholders to answer to.
 
Top