rdwr33
Visionary
for sure to have more profitability and speed are the sit go and other money tables.
S
Station_Master
Rock Star
I mostly play cash, but I think ultimately there is more money to be made in tourneys as more bad players play these games. The problem is you need to commit the time to play the whole thing, which is awkward when you have other commitments, and the variance is very high. Also meaning you need to play slot of tourneys to know if you are a winning player or not.
In general I enjoy cash more as prefer 100bb poker, than short stack play, but nothing beats the final table feeling
In general I enjoy cash more as prefer 100bb poker, than short stack play, but nothing beats the final table feeling
Pokerpoet2
Legend
They both have pro's and con's; in a cash game you can come and go when you please, so you are not tied to a starting time or need to wait until the end. Tournaments however do usually have more money in prize pools, and are harder to win outright, because you are playing a bigger field of players.
My only objective when playing in a big tournament is to try and make the money, once I have achieved that, I try to make the final table, it is only then that I try to be number one and win it outright, setting yourself different challenges along the way means as long as you make your first challenge everything else is a bonus and if you should fail and finish 2nd then there is no shame in that, you are still a winner.
My only objective when playing in a big tournament is to try and make the money, once I have achieved that, I try to make the final table, it is only then that I try to be number one and win it outright, setting yourself different challenges along the way means as long as you make your first challenge everything else is a bonus and if you should fail and finish 2nd then there is no shame in that, you are still a winner.
P
Peteski84
Rock Star
They both have their advantages, quick game with cash or take your time and hope for a position with a tournament.
I get to addicted to the cash games and start a heading toward a losing streak, so i only play them when i know i have very limited play time.
I tend to play tournaments on an evening, sit and chill.
I get to addicted to the cash games and start a heading toward a losing streak, so i only play them when i know i have very limited play time.
I tend to play tournaments on an evening, sit and chill.
E
Erickaie
Rock Star
They both have their advantages I guess, personally I love tournaments! less risks big rewards. most of my biggest wins are from tournaments and events, you just have to be patient enough and one day boom you will hit that first spot in a MTT and you can start from there, However in Cash games I have made some big mistakes with some bad beats and bankroll drained however I guess there are strategies on how to play cash games but im not one of them unless its zoom cash game 
R
Recreationalplayer
Visionary
Tournament variance is much more than cash game variance. Hence you need bigger bankroll for playing Tournaments.
Cash games at low stakes can be played with Bankroll of 20 Buyins. For tournaments, the requirement might be 80 - 100 Buyins.
Its a matter of preference.
Cash games at low stakes can be played with Bankroll of 20 Buyins. For tournaments, the requirement might be 80 - 100 Buyins.
Its a matter of preference.
I
istbno
Enthusiast
It totally depends on the player )
Rui Ferreira
Visionary
I've tried to play cash games, I didn't adapt, I profited in some sessions that I played but I didn't adapt to cash games, I don't know why, so I prefer tournaments
"No one is always a winner, and anyone who says they are is either a liar or has never played poker" - Amarillo Slim
"No one is always a winner, and anyone who says they are is either a liar or has never played poker" - Amarillo Slim
hamon08
Rock Star
Tournaments are the best for me. Because for a relatively small contribution, you can win much more money. But it is necessary to play long and well to start winning. This is a minus of tournaments.
