D
dumpy620_84
Rock Star
Silver Level
Something I have been wondering about is how do you define Loose play vs. Tight play.
Often, people will note in their recounts / hand histories that the player they were up against was, or describe themselves, as loose or tight. In general terms, I think understand what this means. But, loose/tight seems to be a fairly subjective concept. Obviously, there could be degrees of loose/tight. But, how do you define it? Is there a magic number (VP$IP, %flops, etc..) or specific hands / range that differentiate loose and aggressive?
In looking at hand charts, and what is described as loose / tight, I would say that the vast majority of players (at least at the micros / low $$ tourneys) are loose, ultra loose, or super ultra loose. Does the definition change with the stakes, maybe?
Just curious on what others think about this.
Often, people will note in their recounts / hand histories that the player they were up against was, or describe themselves, as loose or tight. In general terms, I think understand what this means. But, loose/tight seems to be a fairly subjective concept. Obviously, there could be degrees of loose/tight. But, how do you define it? Is there a magic number (VP$IP, %flops, etc..) or specific hands / range that differentiate loose and aggressive?
In looking at hand charts, and what is described as loose / tight, I would say that the vast majority of players (at least at the micros / low $$ tourneys) are loose, ultra loose, or super ultra loose. Does the definition change with the stakes, maybe?
Just curious on what others think about this.