I buying into a cash game and starting at a table with relatively small stack. Is it better to sit left or right of the deep stacks? Reasons for your choice?
I assume you are talking online poker with only one table option and you have not got the time to watch the table for a while. To answer your question, I'd prefer the seat to the left of the deep stack, because you would always have position.I buying into a cash game and starting at a table with relatively small stack. Is it better to sit left or right of the deep stacks? Reasons for your choice?
left.... you always want position on the big stack.
simple reasons, by having position you can play optimally to either extract value, or pick them off with well timed bluffs.
You get to see their actions and lead the betting most often. In general the ball will be in your court more often than not and you will have more control over them then they will over you.
P.S. No need to buy in short, buy in max stack and stack em. If you can't afford to buy in max stack, lower your limits until you have a proper bankroll
I buying into a cash game and starting at a table with relatively small stack. Is it better to sit left or right of the deep stacks? Reasons for your choice?
For someone that is more of a novice player, you want to stay to the left. If you are able to play sneaky and deceptive, you can try sitting to the right.
In cash games the main consideration is to try to have tight players on your left and loose players on your right. The reason is, this will allow you to play most pots in position. Position matter more, the deeper stacks get though. So having a short stacked loose player on your left is less bad than a deep stacked loose player.
I sense, that OP might feel, that the big stack is probably the best player. But that is really not the correct way to think about it. In the short term poker is mostly about luck, and you dont even know, how many times he reloaded, before he won a big pot. So in a cash game there is no reason to be afraid of a particular player, just because he is sitting with a big stack.
Its different in tournaments, where the chip leader can threaten your stack without risking to much himself. Having him on your left in a tournament, and especially if he know how to take advantage of it, is a nightmare. But there is nothing, you can do other than just nit up, let him bluff you, and hope that one of you are moved to another table.
left.... you always want position on the big stack.
simple reasons, by having position you can play optimally to either extract value, or pick them off with well timed bluffs.
You get to see their actions and lead the betting most often. In general the ball will be in your court more often than not and you will have more control over them then they will over you.
P.S. No need to buy in short, buy in max stack and stack em. If you can't afford to buy in max stack, lower your limits until you have a proper bankroll
I 100% disagree with the bolded statement above. If you are serious about playing well and want to use all of the tools available to you, you want to stay as close to (or above) max buy-in as you can. As a player, it's important to be able to distinguish between mistakes (which can sometimes be profitable) and bad luck (which always results in a loss) and aim to minimize mistakes and operate with the belief that luck will find a way to even itself out in the long run. Repeating mistakes is basically seen as a leak in your game, and any player who is serious about improving their game should always be striving to plug those holes as soon as they are identified.Totally agree about sitting left to the money, not sure about the PS. In my opinion, buying in for the max is a move that should be reserved for the most advanced players, who expect to be among the very top players at the table. Otherwise the larger the stack the larger the loses, considering the player makes the same mistakes. And the average player totals way more mistakes than times he goes all in having the nuts.
left.... you always want position on the big stack.
simple reasons, by having position you can play optimally to either extract value, or pick them off with well timed bluffs.
You get to see their actions and lead the betting most often. In general the ball will be in your court more often than not and you will have more control over them then they will over you.
P.S. No need to buy in short, buy in max stack and stack em. If you can't afford to buy in max stack, lower your limits until you have a proper bankroll
I 100% disagree with the bolded statement above. If you are serious about playing well and want to use all of the tools available to you, you want to stay as close to (or above) max buy-in as you can. As a player, it's important to be able to distinguish between mistakes (which can sometimes be profitable) and bad luck (which always results in a loss) and aim to minimize mistakes and operate with the belief that luck will find a way to even itself out in the long run. Repeating mistakes is basically seen as a leak in your game, and any player who is serious about improving their game should always be striving to plug those holes as soon as they are identified.
I'd say... don't handicap yourself by starting yourself with a partial stack. And if you are playing at a level where you can't afford to lose, then move down levels until the losses don't really have a significant impact on you. And I do think that if you want to win at the game, you have to operate with the expectation that you will do well at the table (and not expect to lose and hope to win).